Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35354407›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2022

Responding to vulnerable patients with multimorbidity: an interprofessional team approach.

Judith B Brown, Sonja M Reichert, Pauline Boeckxstaens, Moira Stewart, Martin Fortin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Judith B BrownCentre for Studies in Family Medicine, Western Centre for Public Health and Family Medicine, 2nd floor, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, 1151 Richmond St. London, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada. jbbrown@uwo.ca.
Sonja M ReichertCentre for Studies in Family Medicine, Western Centre for Public Health and Family Medicine, 2nd floor, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, 1151 Richmond St. London, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada.
Pauline BoeckxstaensFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, ingang 42 - verdieping, 5 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Moira StewartCentre for Studies in Family Medicine, Western Centre for Public Health and Family Medicine, 2nd floor, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, 1151 Richmond St. London, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada.
Martin FortinUnité de Médecine de Famille, CIUSS du Saguenay-Lac St-Jean, 305 St-Vallier, Chicoutimi, Québec, G7H 5H6, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with multimorbidity, who may be more vulnerable to certain social determinants of health, often require care by an interprofessional primary healthcare (PHC) team that can tailor their approach to address the multiple and complex needs of this population. This paper describes how the needs of vulnerable patients experiencing multimorbidity are identified and provided care by innovative interprofessional PHC teams during an innovative one-hour consultation, outside of usual care.

methodsThis was a descriptive qualitative study. Forty-eight interviews were conducted with 20 allied healthcare professionals: (e.g., social work, pharmacy); 19 physicians (e.g., psychiatry, internal medicine, family medicine); and 9 decision makers. The thematic analysis was iterative using an individual and team approach to identify the main themes and exemplar quotations for illustration.

resultsParticipants described patients with multimorbidity who were vulnerable as those experiencing major challenges accessing and navigating the healthcare system. Mental health issues were a major contributor to being vulnerable and often linked to common social determinants of health. Cultural factors were identified as potentially causing patients to be vulnerable. Participants articulated how the collaborative nature of the team generated new ideas and facilitated creative recommendations designed to meet the specific needs of each patient.

conclusionsThis one-time consultation went beyond the assessment of a patient's multimorbidity by including a psycho-social-contextual understanding of vulnerability within the healthcare system. Findings may have important clinical and policy implications in the adoption and implementation of this approach and further assist vulnerable patients with multimorbidity in having their complex needs addressed.

Indexed as

MultimorbidityPatient Care TeamDelivery of Health CareFamily PracticeHumansQualitative ResearchInterprofessional teamsMultimorbidityPrimary careQualitativeVulnerable patients

Identifiers

PMID35354407
PMCPMC8969317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.