Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35354095›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2022

Multivariate autoregressive model estimation for high-dimensional intracranial electrophysiological data.

Christopher M Endemann, Bryan M Krause, Kirill V Nourski, Matthew I Banks, Barry Van Veen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christopher M EndemannDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Bryan M KrauseDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Kirill V NourskiDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA; Iowa Neuroscience Institute, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Matthew I BanksDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA; Department of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA. Electronic address: mibanks@wisc.edu.
Barry Van VeenDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF IOWA CTSA FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024979 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI ROSENTHAL, GARY E · 2007 to 2011
$31.8M
HUMAN AUDITORY CORTEX PHYSIOLOGYR01DC004290 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HOWARD, MATTHEW A. · 2000 to 2025
$13.7M
Thalamic and cortical mechanisms of anesthetic-induced unconsciousnessR01GM109086 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Matthew I Banks, Kirill V Nourski · 2014 to 2026
$5.7M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024979NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004290NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM109086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fundamental to elucidating the functional organization of the brain is the assessment of causal interactions between different brain regions. Multivariate autoregressive (MVAR) modeling techniques applied to multisite electrophysiological recordings are a promising avenue for identifying such causal links. They estimate the degree to which past activity in one or more brain regions is predictive of another region's present activity, while simultaneously accounting for the mediating effects of other regions. Including as many mediating variables as possible in the model has the benefit of drastically reducing the odds of detecting spurious causal connectivity. However, effective bounds on the number of MVAR model coefficients that can be estimated reliably from limited data make exploiting the potential of MVAR models challenging for even modest numbers of recording sites. Here, we utilize well-established dimensionality-reduction techniques to fit MVAR models to human intracranial data from ∼100 - 200 recording sites spanning dozens of anatomically and functionally distinct cortical regions. First, we show that high-dimensional MVAR models can be successfully estimated from long segments of data and yield plausible connectivity profiles. Next, we use these models to generate synthetic data with known ground-truth connectivity to explore the utility of applying principal component analysis and group least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (gLASSO) to reduce the number of parameters (connections) during model fitting to shorter data segments. We show that gLASSO is highly effective for recovering ground-truth connectivity in the limited data regime, capturing important features of connectivity for high-dimensional models with as little as 10 seconds of data. The methods presented here have broad applicability to the analysis of high-dimensional time series data in neuroscience, facilitating the elucidation of the neural basis of sensation, cognition, and arousal.

Indexed as

Brain MappingElectroencephalographyBrainHumansNeural PathwaysDynamic connectivityEffective connectivityInsulaPartial directed coherence

Identifiers

PMID35354095
PMCPMC9360562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.