Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35354066›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2022

Sequential sampling from memory underlies action selection during abstract decision-making.

S Shushruth, Ariel Zylberberg, Michael N Shadlen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Decoupling Choice from Motor Response Reduces Choice-History Effects.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Visual field map size constrains working memory precision.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evidence for Abstract Codes in Parietal Cortex Guiding Prospective Working Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  6. No Central Executive? Decision Formation Through Multi-Area Population Dynamics.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Hippocampus Preorders Movements for Skilled Action Sequences.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Neural Correlates of Online Action Preparation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  14. A Neural Decision Signal during Internal Sampling from Working Memory in Humans.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S ShushruthZuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Department of Neuroscience, New York, NY 10027, USA. Electronic address: shushruth@gmail.com.
Ariel ZylberbergZuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Department of Neuroscience, New York, NY 10027, USA. Electronic address: ariel.zylberberg@gmail.com.
Michael N ShadlenZuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Department of Neuroscience, New York, NY 10027, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, New York, NY 10027, USA; Kavli Institute, Columbia University, 612 West 130th Street, New York, NY 10027, USA. Electronic address: shadlen@columbia.edu.

Funding

NEURAL MECHANISMS OF VISUAL PERCEPTIONR01EY011378 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SHADLEN, MICHAEL NEIL · 1996 to 2017
$3.8M
Uncovering the neural architecture underlying decisions abstracted from movementsR01MH122513 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BICKEL, STEPHAN, KELLY, SIMON · 2020 to 2024
$1.9M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNEI NIH HHS R01 EY011378NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH122513
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of perceptual decision-making in monkeys has provided insights into the process by which sensory evidence is integrated toward a decision. When monkeys make decisions with the knowledge of the motor actions the decisions bear upon, the process of evidence integration is instantiated by neurons involved in the selection of said actions. It is less clear how monkeys make decisions when unaware of the actions required to communicate their choice-what we refer to as "abstract" decisions. We investigated this by training monkeys to associate the direction of motion of a noisy random-dot display with the color of two targets. Crucially, the targets were displayed at unpredictable locations after the motion stimulus was extinguished. We found that the monkeys postponed decision formation until the targets were revealed. Neurons in the parietal association area LIP represented the integration of evidence leading to a choice, but as the stimulus was no longer visible, the samples of evidence must have been retrieved from short-term memory. Our results imply that when decisions are temporally unyoked from the motor actions they bear upon, decision formation is protracted until they can be framed in terms of motor actions.

Indexed as

Motion PerceptionParietal LobeAnimalsDecision MakingMacaca mulattaNeuronsPhotic Stimulationdecision making, abstraction, short-term memory, area LIP, macaque monkey

Identifiers

PMID35354066
PMCPMC9090972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.