Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35353597›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2022

Structural Validity, Internal Consistency, and Rater Reliability of the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile: Breaking Ground on a 52,726-Patient, Clinical Data Set.

Alex E Clain, Munirah Alkhuwaiter, Kate Davidson, Bonnie Martin-Harris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Quantifying Oropharyngeal Swallowing Impairment in Response to Bolus Viscosity.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2024
    Observational
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Swallow Reaction Time in Healthy Adults.Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alex E ClainRoxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.ORCID 0000-0002-9718-009X
Munirah AlkhuwaiterRoxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
Kate DavidsonDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.ORCID 0000-0002-8028-5223
Bonnie Martin-HarrisRoxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.ORCID 0000-0001-7840-3764

Funding

Research and Mentoring on Swallowing Impairment and Respiratory-Swallow CoordinatK24DC012801 · NIDCD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI MARTIN-HARRIS, BONNIE J · 2013 to 2024
$1.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS K24 DC012801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to extend the assessment of the psychometric properties of the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP). Here, we re-examined structural validity and internal consistency using a large clinical-registry data set and formally examined rater reliability in a smaller data set.

methodThis study consists of a retrospective structural validity and internal consistency analysis of MBSImP using a large data set (

resultsThe exploratory factor analysis showed a two-factor solution with factors precisely corresponding to the scale's oral and pharyngeal domains, consistent with findings from the initial study. Component 17, that is, the esophageal domain, did not load onto either factor. Internal consistency was good for both the oral and pharyngeal domains (α

conclusionsThis study leverages a large-scale, clinical data set to provide strong, generalizable evidence that the MBSImP assessment method has excellent structural validity and internal consistency. In addition, the results show that MBSImP-trained speech-language pathologists can demonstrate good interrater and intrarater reliability.

Indexed as

DeglutitionBariumHumansProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesBarium

Identifiers

PMID35353597
PMCPMC9559782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.