Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35353358›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2022

Postdural Puncture Headache-Risks and Current Treatment.

Huili Li, Yun Wang, Adriana D Oprea, Jinlei Li

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06640634 (Effect of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Postdural Puncture Headache), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06640634 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Postdural Puncture Headache: Results of Two Randomized Sham - Controlled Trials

TypeinterventionalSponsorNeuromed IRCCSRan2022 to 2024Enrolled97ConditionsPostdural Puncture Headache, Lumbar PunctureArmsactive in therapeutic tDCS (Th-tDCS): anodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (a-tDCS), sham in therapeutic tDCS (Th-tDCS): anodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (a-tDCS), active in preventive tDCS (Pr-tDCS): anodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (a-tDCS), sham in preventive tDCS (Pr-tDCS): anodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (a-tDCS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Predictors of post-lumbar puncture headache in an academic outpatient neurology setting: a retrospective exploratory study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Clinical management of dural defects: A review.World journal of clinical cases · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Huili LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China.
Yun WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China.
Adriana D OpreaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, 20 York Street, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
Jinlei LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, 20 York Street, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA. jinlei.li@yale.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4026-2569
Capital Medical University · CNYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis manuscript aims to review the risks and the current treatments for postdural puncture headache (PDPH). RECENT

findingsPDPH is a relatively frequent complication after neuraxial blocks. It is typically orthostatic in nature, presenting as a positional and dull aching or throbbing headache, with added dysregulation of auditory and/or visual signals. Certain characteristics, such as female sex and young age, may predispose patients to the development of PDPH, as may factors such as previous PDPH, bearing down during the second stage of labor, and the neuraxial technique itself. Long-term complications including chronic headache for years following dural puncture have brought into question of the historical classification of PDPH as a self-limiting headache. So far, the underlying mechanism governing PDPH remains under investigation, while a wide variety of prophylactic and therapeutic measures have been explored with various degree of success. In case of mild PDPH, conservative management involving bed rest and pharmacological management should be used as first-line treatment. Nerve blocks are highly efficient alternatives for PDPH patients who do not respond well to conservative treatment. In case of moderate-to-severe PDPH, epidural blood patch remains the therapy of choice. An interdisciplinary approach to care for patients with PDPH is recommended to achieve optimal outcomes.

Indexed as

Analgesia, ObstetricalPost-Dural Puncture HeadacheBlood Patch, EpiduralFemaleHeadacheHumansSpinal PunctureNerve blocksPostdural puncture headacheRisk factorsTreatments

Identifiers

PMID35353358
OpenAlexW4220741473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.