ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2022
Prediction Model for Intrahepatic Distant Recurrence After Radiofrequency Ablation for Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma 2 cm or Smaller.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Undertreated Volume and Tumor Morphology as Predictors of Outcome Following Thermal Ablation of 3-7-cm Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR · 2025Trial
- Risk Factors for Intrahepatic Distant Recurrence After Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Article
- Low Intrahepatic Distant Recurrence Rate Following RFA Using Linear Mode in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Article
- Nomogram for predicting post-therapy recurrence in BCLC A/B hepatocellular carcinoma with Child-Pugh B cirrhosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntrahepatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a high recurrence rate after radiofrequency ablation (RFA). However, to date, no standalone predictive factors for intrahepatic distant recurrence after curative ablation have been reported.
aimsThe aim of this study was to investigate predictive factors for intrahepatic distant recurrence after curative treatment with RFA for HCCs.
methodsThis multicenter study consisted of 17 institutions that registered 821 patients. The risk factors for intrahepatic distant recurrence after complete ablation by RFA for primary HCC ≤ 2 cm in diameter were identified in a retrospectively collected training set (n = 636) and then validated in a prospectively collected validation set (n = 185).
resultsThe cumulative intrahepatic distant and local recurrence rates (i.e., entire recurrence rate) in the training set were 23.6% and 53.7% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. The cumulative intrahepatic distant recurrence rates in the training set were 17.0% and 43.8% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. Multivariate analysis of the training set showed that tumor number and serum levels of α-fetoprotein (AFP) and des-γ-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) were independent risk factors for both entire recurrence and intrahepatic distant recurrence. Intrahepatic distant recurrence risk in both the training and validation cohorts was stratified using a scoring system with three factors: tumor number (single or multiple), AFP (< 10 ng/ml or ≥ 10 ng/ml), and DCP (< 50 mAU/ml or ≥ 50 mAU/ml).
conclusionThe scoring system composed of tumor number, AFP, and DCP is useful for classifying the risk of intrahepatic distant recurrence after curative ablation for HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35353331What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.