Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35353322›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2022

Acute Stress Reaction in Combat: Emerging Evidence and Peer-Based Interventions.

Amy B Adler, Ian A Gutierrez

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Resilience enhancement interventions for disaster rescue workers: a systematic review.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Guidelines for handling released captives before transfer to medical facilities in Israel.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Social Determinants of Suicide and Suicidality in Serving Military Personnel: A Global Scoping Review.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amy B AdlerWalter Reed Army Institute of Research, 503 Robert Grant Ave, Silver Spring, MD, 20910, USA. amy.b.adler.civ@mail.mil.ORCID 0000-0002-0886-5530
Ian A GutierrezWalter Reed Army Institute of Research, 503 Robert Grant Ave, Silver Spring, MD, 20910, USA.
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis paper highlights the topic of combat-related acute stress reactions (ASRs) in service members. Specifically, we contrast ASRs with related psychiatric conditions, report the estimated prevalence of ASRs for soldiers deployed to combat, and discuss how team members can effectively respond to these reactions. RECENT

findingsAlthough not regarded as a clinical disorder, ASRs can have a significant impact on high-risk occupations like the military in which impaired functioning can imperil team members and others. Based on self-report, 17.2% of soldiers who have deployed to combat report having experienced a possible ASR. To our knowledge, this is the first such prevalence estimate. The prevalence of ASRs underscores the need for improved prevention, management, and recovery strategies. Peer-based intervention protocols such as iCOVER may provide a useful starting point to address ASRs in team members.

Indexed as

Combat DisordersMilitary PersonnelStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticStress Disorders, Traumatic, AcuteHumansPeer GroupPrevalenceSelf ReportAmygdala hijackCombat experiencesHigh-risk occupationsiCOVERPeer supportYaHaLOM

Identifiers

PMID35353322
PMCPMC8965216
OpenAlexW4220837393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.