Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35353266›Full record

ReviewNeurosurgical review2022

Intraoperative ultrasound in brain tumor surgery: A review and implementation guide.

Luke Dixon, Adrian Lim, Matthew Grech-Sollars, Dipankar Nandi, Sophie Camp

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurosurgical review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Intraoperative MRI in pediatric brain tumor surgery: an 18-year single-center experience.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Image-Guided Brain Tumor Surgery.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luke DixonDepartment of Imaging, Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust, London, UK. luke.dixon03@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4060-7897
Adrian LimDepartment of Imaging, Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust, London, UK.
Matthew Grech-SollarsDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Dipankar NandiDivision of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Sophie CampDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate and reliable intraoperative neuronavigation is crucial for achieving maximal safe resection of brain tumors. Intraoperative MRI (iMRI) has received significant attention as the next step in improving navigation. However, the immense cost and logistical challenge of iMRI precludes implementation in most centers worldwide. In comparison, intraoperative ultrasound (ioUS) is an affordable tool, easily incorporated into existing theatre infrastructure, and operative workflow. Historically, ultrasound has been perceived as difficult to learn and standardize, with poor, artifact-prone image quality. However, ioUS has dramatically evolved over the last decade, with vast improvements in image quality and well-integrated navigation tools. Advanced techniques, such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), have also matured and moved from the research field into actual clinical use. In this review, we provide a comprehensive and pragmatic guide to ioUS. A suggested protocol to facilitate learning ioUS and improve standardization is provided, and an outline of common artifacts and methods to minimize them given. The review also includes an update of advanced techniques and how they can be incorporated into clinical practice.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsNeuronavigationHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingUltrasonographyGliomaImage-guidedNeuronavigationOncologyUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID35353266
PMCPMC9349149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.