Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35353240›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2022

Humeral stem with low filling ratio reduces stress shielding in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Su Cheol Kim, Jong Hun Park, Hashem Bukhary, Jae Chul Yoo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Su Cheol KimDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea.
Jong Hun ParkDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea.
Hashem BukharyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea.
Jae Chul YooDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea. shoulderyoo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8378-1583
Samsung Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSome patients show severe humeral bone stress shielding even one year after press-fit humeral stem, which can be a risk factor for implant durability. This study compared humeral stress shielding and clinical outcomes between high and low filling ratio (HFR and LFR) stems in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA).

methodsFrom 2015 to 2020, 104 patients who underwent RSA with a non-cemented standard-length humeral stem were examined. The humeral stems included large press-fit stems (HFR group, 53 patients) or small non-press-fit stems with autogenous cancellous bone grafting (LFR group, 51 patients). The radiologic and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups one year post-operatively.

resultsOne patient in the LFR group with early infectious dislocation was excluded from the 1-one year evaluation. No stress shielding was observed in 27/50 (54.0%) and 5/53 (9.4%) of patients in the LFR and HFR groups, while 3/50 (6%) and 19/53 (35.8%) patients showed high-stress shielding, respectively. However, the stem alignment change, subsidence, complications and evidence of loosening did not differ between the groups. The final range-of-motion and functional scores were significantly poorer in the LFR group than those in the HFR group, although the difference was minimal.

conclusionEven at one year follow-up, patients receiving LFR stems with autogenous bone grafting had significantly less humeral stress shielding compared to patients with HFR stem with press-fit in primary RSA, without compromising stem stability.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, ShoulderShoulder JointShoulder ProsthesisHumansHumerusRange of Motion, ArticularRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeArthroplastyFilling ratioHumeral stemOsteolysisResorptionReverse shoulder arthroplastyReverse total shoulder arthroplastyStress shielding

Identifiers

PMID35353240
OpenAlexW4220941671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.