Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35353211›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2022

Comparison of cardiac volumetry using real-time MRI during free-breathing with standard cine MRI during breath-hold in children.

Lena Maria Röwer, Karl Ludger Radke, Janina Benner, Halima Malik, Tobias Uelwer, Dirk Voit, Jens Frahm, Hans-Joerg Wittsack, Stefan Harmeling, Frank Pillekamp and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The future of CMR: All-in-one vs. real-time CMR (Part 2).Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. External Hardware and Sensors, for Improved MRI.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lena Maria RöwerDepartment of General Pediatrics, Neonatology and Pediatric Cardiology, University Children's Hospital, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Dusseldorf, Germany. lena.roewer@uni-duesseldorf.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5525-6383
Karl Ludger RadkeDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Janina BennerDepartment of General Pediatrics, Neonatology and Pediatric Cardiology, University Children's Hospital, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Halima MalikDepartment of General Pediatrics, Neonatology and Pediatric Cardiology, University Children's Hospital, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Tobias UelwerDepartment of Computer Science, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Dirk VoitBiomedizinische NMR, Max-Planck-Institut für biophysikalische Chemie, Göttingen, Germany.
Jens FrahmBiomedizinische NMR, Max-Planck-Institut für biophysikalische Chemie, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8279-884X
Hans-Joerg WittsackDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Stefan HarmelingDepartment of Computer Science, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Frank PillekampDepartment of General Pediatrics, Neonatology and Pediatric Cardiology, University Children's Hospital, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Dusseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1968-8944
Dirk KleeDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DEGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiac real-time magnetic resonance imaging (RT-MRI) provides high-quality images even during free-breathing. Difficulties in post-processing impede its use in clinical routine.

objectiveTo demonstrate the feasibility of quantitative analysis of cardiac free-breathing RT-MRI and to compare image quality and volumetry during free-breathing RT-MRI in pediatric patients to standard breath-hold cine MRI. MATERIALS AND

methodsPediatric patients (n = 22) received cardiac RT-MRI volumetry during free breathing (1.5 T; short axis; 30 frames per s) in addition to standard breath-hold cine imaging in end-expiration. Real-time images were binned retrospectively based on electrocardiography and respiratory bellows. Image quality and volumetry were compared using the European Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance registry score, structure visibility rating, linear regression and Bland-Altman analyses.

resultsAdditional time for binning of real-time images was 2 min. For both techniques, image quality was rated good to excellent. RT-MRI was significantly more robust against artifacts (P < 0.01). Linear regression revealed good correlations for the ventricular volumes. Bland-Altman plots showed a good limit of agreement (LoA) for end-diastolic volume (left ventricle [LV]: LoA -0.1 ± 2.7 ml/m

conclusionCompared to standard cine MRI with breath hold, RT-MRI during free breathing with retrospective respiratory binning offers good image quality, reduced image artifacts enabling fast quantitative evaluations of ventricular volumes in clinical practice under physiological conditions.

Indexed as

Breath HoldingMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineChildHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesStroke VolumeChildrenComputer-assistedHeartImage processingMagnetic resonance imagingRespirationVolumetry

Identifiers

PMID35353211
PMCPMC9271116
OpenAlexW4220666084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.