Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35353167›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2022

Effect of Tacrolimus vs Intravenous Cyclophosphamide on Complete or Partial Response in Patients With Lupus Nephritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Zhaohui Zheng, Haitao Zhang, Xiaomei Peng, Chun Zhang, Changying Xing, Gang Xu, Ping Fu, Zhaohui Ni, Jianghua Chen, Zhonggao Xu and 12 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02457221 (A Phase III, Randomized, Open, Parallel-controlled, Multi-center Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus Capsules and Cyclophosphamide Injection in Treatment of Lupus Nephritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02457221 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III, Randomized, Open, Parallel-controlled, Multi-center Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus Capsules and Cyclophosphamide Injection in Treatment of Lupus Nephritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorAstellas Pharma China, Inc.Ran2015 to 2018Enrolled314ConditionsLupus NephritisArmsTacrolimus capsules, Cyclophosphamide injections, Prednisone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Effects of Different Types ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. SGLT2 inhibitors in CKD: are they really effective in all patients?Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 19 institutions in 1 country.

Zhaohui ZhengDepartment of Rheumatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Haitao ZhangNational Clinical Research Center of Kidney Diseases, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Xiaomei PengDepartment of Nephrology, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.
Chun ZhangDepartment of Nephrology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Changying XingDepartment of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Gang XuDepartment of Nephrology, Tongji Hospital affiliated with Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Ping FuRenal Division, Department of Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Kidney Research Institute, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Zhaohui NiDepartment of Nephrology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Jianghua ChenKidney Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Zhonggao XuDepartment of Nephrology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Ming-Hui ZhaoRenal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University, Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China, Key Laboratory of Chronic Kidney Disease Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education of China, and Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing, China.
Shaomei LiDepartment of Nephrology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Xiangyang HuangDepartment of Nephrology, Liuzhou Worker's Hospital, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China.
Lining MiaoDepartment of Nephrology, Second Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Xiaonong ChenDepartment of Nephrology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Bicheng LiuInstitute of Nephrology, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University School of Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Yongcheng HeDepartment of Nephrology, Shenzhen Hengsheng Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Jing LiDepartment of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Ürümqi, China.
Lijun LiuAstellas Pharma China, Inc.
Haishan KadeerbaiAstellas Pharma China, Inc.
Zhangsuo LiuDepartment of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Zhihong LiuNational Clinical Research Center of Kidney Diseases, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Astellas Pharma (China) · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University · CNFourth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University · CNJiangsu Province Hospital · CNJilin University · CNNanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command · CNNanjing University · CNPeking University · CNRenji Hospital · CNRuijin Hospital · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University · CNSecond Hospital of Hebei Medical University · CNThe People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region · CNTongji Hospital · CNUnion Hospital · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CNZhejiang University · CNZhongda Hospital Southeast University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Lupus nephritis (LN) is typically treated with intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCY), which is associated with serious adverse effects. Tacrolimus may be an alternative for initial treatment of LN; however, large-scale, randomized clinical studies of tacrolimus are lacking. Objective: To assess efficacy and safety of tacrolimus vs IVCY as an initial therapy for LN in China. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized (1:1), open-label, parallel-controlled, phase 3, noninferiority clinical trial recruited patients aged 18 to 60 years with systemic lupus erythematosus and LN class III, IV, V, III+V, or IV+V primarily from outpatient settings at 35 centers in China. Inclusion criteria included body mass index of 18.5 or greater to less than 27, 24-hour urine protein of 1.5 g or greater, and serum creatinine of less than 260 μmol/L. Of 505 patients screened, 191 failed screening (163 ineligible, 25 withdrawn consent, and 3 other reasons). Overall, 314 were randomized. The first patient was enrolled March 10, 2015, and the study finished September 13, 2018. The follow-up period was 24 weeks. Data were analyzed from December 2019 to March 2020. Interventions: Oral tacrolimus (target trough level, 4-10 ng/mL) or IVCY for 24 weeks plus prednisone. Main Outcomes and Measures: Complete or partial response rate at week 24 (prespecified). Results: A total of 314 patients were randomized (158 [50.3%] to tacrolimus and 156 [49.7%] to IVCY). Overall, 299 patients (95.2%) were treated (tacrolimus group, 157 [52.5%]; IVCY group, 142 [47.5%]). Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were generally similar between groups (mean [SD] age, 34.2 [9.5] years; 262 [87.6%] female). Tacrolimus was found to be noninferior to IVCY for LN response at week 24. There was a complete or partial response rate of 83.0% (117 of 141 patients) in the tacrolimus group and 75.0% (93 of 124 patients) in the IVCY group (difference, 7.1%; 2-sided 95% CI, -2.7% to 16.9%; lower limit of 95% CI greater than -15%). At week 24, least-square mean change in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index score was -8.6 with tacrolimus and -6.4 with IVCY (difference, -2.2; 95% CI, -3.1 to -1.3). Changes in other immune parameters and kidney function were generally similar between groups. Serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 29 patients in the tacrolimus group (18.5%) and 35 patients in the IVCY group (24.6%). Most common serious study drug-related TEAEs were infections (14 [8.9%] and 23 [16.2%], respectively). Seven patients in each group withdrew due to AEs. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, oral tacrolimus appeared noninferior to IVCY for initial therapy of active LN, with a more favorable safety profile than IVCY. Tacrolimus may be an alternative to IVCY as initial therapy for LN. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02457221.

Indexed as

Lupus NephritisTacrolimusAdultCyclophosphamideDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultCyclophosphamideImmunosuppressive AgentsTacrolimus

Identifiers

PMID35353167
PMCPMC8969066
OpenAlexW4220955648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.