Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35353006›Full record

ArticlemSystems2022

Postmortem Skeletal Microbial Community Composition and Function in Buried Human Remains.

Alexandra L Emmons, Amy Z Mundorff, Katharina M Hoeland, Jonathan Davoren, Sarah W Keenan, David O Carter, Shawn R Campagna, Jennifer M DeBruyn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSystems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
30.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandra L EmmonsDepartment of Anthropology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Amy Z MundorffDepartment of Anthropology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Katharina M HoelandDepartment of Chemistry, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Jonathan DavorenBode Cellmark Forensics, Lorton, Virginia, USA.
Sarah W KeenanDepartment of Geology and Geological Engineeringgrid.263790.9, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, South Dakota, USA.
David O CarterSchool of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Chaminade University of Honolulugrid.253990.4, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1885-5237
Shawn R CampagnaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Jennifer M DeBruynDepartment of Biosystems Engineering and Soil Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2993-4144
University of Tennessee at Knoxville · USChaminade University of Honolulu · USSouth Dakota School of Mines and Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bones and teeth can provide a lasting resource to identify human remains following decomposition. Bone can support dynamic communities of micro- and macroscopic scavengers and incidental taxa, which influence the preservation of bone over time. Previously we identified key microbial taxa associated with survivability of DNA in bones of surface-decomposed human remains, observing high intra- and interindividual variation. Here we characterized the postmortem bone microbiome of skeletal remains in a multi-individual burial to better understand subsurface bone colonization and preservation. To understand microbial community origins and assembly, 16S rRNA amplicon sequences from 256 bone and 27 soil samples were compared to bone from individuals who decomposed on the ground surface, and human gut sequences from the American Gut Project. Untargeted metabolomics was applied to a subset of 41 bone samples from buried remains to examine potential microbe-metabolite interactions and infer differences related to community functionality. Results show that postmortem bone microbial communities are distinct from those of the oxic surface soils and the human gut. Microbial communities from surface-deposited bone and shallow buried bone were more similar to those from soils, while bones recovered from saturated areas deeper in the grave showed increased similarity with human gut samples with higher representation of anaerobic taxa, suggesting that the depositional environment affected the established bone microbiome. Correlations between metabolites and microbes indicate that phosphate solubilization is likely an important mechanism of microbially mediated skeletal degradation. This research expands our knowledge of microbial bone colonizers, including colonizers important in a burial environment.

Indexed as

Body RemainsMicrobiotaDNAHumansRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilDNARNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilbonemetabolomicsmicrobial ecologymicrobiomeskeletal DNAskeletonsoil microbiologysubsurface decompositiontaphonomy

Identifiers

PMID35353006
PMCPMC9040591
OpenAlexW4220752555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.