Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35352979›Full record

ReviewmBio2022

The Impact of Evolving SARS-CoV-2 Mutations and Variants on COVID-19 Vaccines.

Gary McLean, Jeremy Kamil, Benhur Lee, Penny Moore, Thomas F Schulz, Alexander Muik, Ugur Sahin, Özlem Türeci, Shanti Pather

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in mBio, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 120 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
19.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 201 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Ulcerative supraglottitis - a unique presentation of COVID-19 infection.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Gary McLeanSchool of Human Sciences, London Metropolitan Universitygrid.23231.31 and National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1278-1743
Jeremy KamilLouisiana State University Health, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8422-7656
Benhur LeeIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0760-1709
Penny MooreCentre for HIV and STIs, National Institute for Communicable Diseases of the National Health Laboratory Services, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-8719-4028
Thomas F SchulzInstitute of Virology, Hannover Medical Schoolgrid.10423.34, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8792-5345
Alexander MuikBioNTech, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4561-2273
Ugur SahinBioNTech, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0363-1564
Özlem TüreciBioNTech, Mainz, Germany.
Shanti PatherBioNTech, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1244-6264
BioNTech (Germany) · DEIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USLondon Metropolitan University · GBLouisiana State University · USMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DENational Health Laboratory Service · ZA

Funding

Stress Exacerbates Myocardial Ischemic Injury by Blocking Estrogen's Antidoxidant Protection in the Female HeartP20GM121307 · NIGMS · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV HSC SHREVEPORT · PI Vesna Tesic · 2018 to 2026
$23.6M
BioNtech N/ANIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM121307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of several new variants of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in recent months has raised concerns around the potential impact on ongoing vaccination programs. Data from clinical trials and real-world evidence suggest that current vaccines remain highly effective against the alpha variant (B.1.1.7), while some vaccines have reduced efficacy and effectiveness against symptomatic disease caused by the beta variant (B.1.351) and the delta variant (B.1.617.2); however, effectiveness against severe disease and hospitalization caused by delta remains high. Although data on the effectiveness of the primary regimen against omicron (B.1.1.529) are limited, booster programs using mRNA vaccines have been shown to restore protection against infection and symptomatic disease (regardless of the vaccine used for the primary regimen) and maintain high effectiveness against hospitalization. However, effectiveness against infection and symptomatic disease wanes with time after the booster dose. Studies have demonstrated reductions of varying magnitude in neutralizing activity of vaccine-elicited antibodies against a range of SARS-CoV-2 variants, with the omicron variant in particular exhibiting partial immune escape. However, evidence suggests that T-cell responses are preserved across vaccine platforms, regardless of variant of concern. Nevertheless, various mitigation strategies are under investigation to address the potential for reduced efficacy or effectiveness against current and future SARS-CoV-2 variants, including modification of vaccines for certain variants (including omicron), multivalent vaccine formulations, and different delivery mechanisms.

Indexed as

COVID-19Viral VaccinesAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansMutationSARS-CoV-2Antibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesViral VaccinesCOVID-19mutationSARS-CoV-2vaccinesvariant

Identifiers

PMID35352979
PMCPMC9040821
OpenAlexW4221113661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.