ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2022
Clinical Performance of Nanopore Targeted Sequencing for Diagnosing Infectious Diseases.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic accuracy of nanopore sequencing for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis and drug-resistant strains: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluating long-read metagenomics for bloodstream infection diagnostics: a pilot study from a Thai Tertiary Hospital.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Nanopore-targeted sequencing improves the diagnosis and treatment of patients with infectious ascites.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Diagnostic value of mNGS for CNSIs in hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients.Blood science (Baltimore, Md.) · 2026Article
- Assessing Nanopore Targeted Sequencing for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Infections: A Comparative Multidisease Approach.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2026Article
- Current status and prospects of nanopore sequencing technology in the detection of pathogenic microorganisms.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Clinical application of chest CT image screening combined with nanopore targeted sequencing in improving the diagnosis rate of pulmonary tuberculosis patients.Frontiers in public health · 2026Observational
- The evolution of diagnostic microbiology: integrating culture-based methods and genomic advances.PeerJ · 2026Review
- Next Generation Sequencing Improves Diagnostic 16S rRNA Amplicon-Based Microbiota Analyses of Clinical Samples Compared to Sanger Sequencing.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- Clinical performance of nanopore targeted sequencing for diagnosing endophthalmitis.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Evaluation of long-read 16S rRNA next-generation sequencing for identification of bacterial isolates in a clinical diagnostic laboratory.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2025Article
- Clinical application of targeted nanopore sequencing in pathogen detection in patients with sepsis.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Diagnosis of Coxiella burnetii endocarditis by using nanopore targeted sequencing: a case report.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Laboratory capacity-building during COVID-19 in Somalia: improving access to essential diagnostics for national health security in a fragile setting.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2025Article
- Nanopore targeted sequencing identifies pathogens in patients with postoperative endophthalmitis.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Nanopore targeted sequencing in lower respiratory infections: a retrospective study on diagnostic applications, clinical characterization, and antimicrobial guidance.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis: Immune-Pathogen Imbalance in a Treatment-Resistant Benign Inflammatory Disease.International journal of women's health · 2025Review
- Comparison of the diagnostic capabilities of tNGS and mNGS for pathogens causing lower respiratory tract infections: a prospective observational study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Observational
- Clinical utility of nanopore-targeted sequencing for diagnosing and treating pulmonary infectious diseases from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Nanopore-targeted sequencing (NTS) for intracranial tuberculosis: a promising and reliable approach.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The gold standard for confirming bacterial infections is culture-positive, which has a long sample-to-result turnaround time and poor sensitivity for unculturable and fastidious pathogens; therefore, it is hard to guide early, targeted antimicrobial therapy and reduce overuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Nanopore targeted sequencing (NTS) is reported to be advantageous in detection speed and range over culture in prior published reports. However, investigation of the clinical performance of NTS is deficient at present. Thus, we assessed the feasibility of NTS for the first time with cohort and systematic comparisons with traditional culture assays and PCR followed by Sanger sequencing. This retrospective study was performed on 472 samples, including 6 specimen types from 436 patients, to evaluate the clinical performance of NTS designed for identifying the microbial composition of various infections. Of these samples, 86.7% were found to be NTS positive, which was significantly higher than culture-positive (26.7%). A total of 425 significant human opportunistic bacteria and fungi detected by NTS were selected to go through validation with PCR followed by Sanger sequencing. The average accuracy rate was 85.2% (maximum 100% created by Cryptococcus neoformans, the last one 66.7% provided by both Staphylococcus haemolyticus and Moraxella osloensis, minimum 0% produced by Burkholderia cepacia). The accuracy rate also varied with sample type; the highest accuracy rate was found in pleural and ascites fluid (95.8%) followed by bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (88.7%), urine (86.8%), and wound secretions (85.0%), while the lowest was present in cerebrospinal fluid (58.8%). NTS had a diagnostic sensitivity of 94.5% and specificity of 31.8%. The positive and negative predictive values of NTS were 79.9% and 66.7%, respectively. For diagnosis of infectious diseases, the sensitivity was greatly increased by 56.7% in NTS compared with culture (94.5% vs 37.8%). Therefore, NTS can accurately detect the causative pathogens in infectious samples, particularly in pleural and ascites fluid, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, urine, and wound secretions, with a short turnaround time of 8-14 h, and might innovatively contribute to personalizing antibiotic treatments for individuals with standardized protocols in clinical practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.