Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35352847›Full record

ArticleHistopathology2022

Shrinkage versus fragmentation response in neoadjuvantly treated oesophageal adenocarcinoma: significant prognostic relevance.

Cristina Graham Martinez, Sonay Kus Öztürk, Ali Al-Kaabi, Maria J Valkema, John-Melle Bokhorst, Camiel Rosman, Heidi Rütten, Carla A P Wauters, Michail Doukas, Joseph Jan-Baptist van Lanschot and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Histopathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cristina Graham MartinezDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1186-4053
Sonay Kus Öztürk *Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Ali Al-Kaabi *Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Maria J Valkema *Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
John-Melle BokhorstDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Camiel RosmanDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Heidi RüttenDepartment of Radiotherapy, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Carla A P WautersDepartment of Pathology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Michail DoukasDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Joseph Jan-Baptist van LanschotDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Peter D SiersemaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Iris D NagtegaalDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0887-4127
Rachel Sofia van der PostDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLCanisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding KWF UL 2013-6311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsNo consensus exists on the clinical value of tumour regression grading (TRG) systems for therapy effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Existing TRG systems lack standardization and reproducibility, and do not consider the morphological heterogeneity of tumour response. Therefore, we aim to identify morphological tumour regression patterns of oesophageal adenocarcinoma after nCRT and their association with survival. METHODS AND

resultsPatients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma, who underwent nCRT followed by surgery and achieved a partial response to nCRT, were identified from two Dutch upper-gastrointestinal (GI) centres (2005-18; test cohort). Resection specimens were scored for regression patterns by two independent observers according to a pre-defined three-step flowchart. The results were validated in an external cohort (2001-17). In total, 110 patients were included in the test cohort and 115 in the validation cohort. In the test cohort, two major regression patterns were identified: fragmentation (60%) and shrinkage (40%), with an excellent interobserver agreement (κ = 0.87). Here, patients with a fragmented pattern had a significantly higher pathological stage (stages III/IV: 52 versus 16%; P < 0.001), less downstaging (48 versus 91%; P < 0.001), a higher risk of recurrence [risk ratio (RR) = 2.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.5-5.6] and poorer 5-year overall survival (30 versus 80% respectively, P = 0.001).

conclusionsThe validation cohort confirmed these findings, although had more advanced cases (case-stages = III/IV 91 versus 73%, P = 0.005) and a higher prevalence of fragmented-pattern cases (80 versus 60%, P = 0.002). When combining the cohorts in multivariate analysis, the pattern of response was an independent prognostic factor [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.0-3.0]. In conclusion, we established an externally validated, reproducible and clinically relevant classification of tumour response.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaEsophageal NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsTreatment Outcomeneoadjuvant chemoradiation treatmentoesophageal cancerpatterns of responseresponse

Identifiers

PMID35352847
PMCPMC9325353
OpenAlexW4220994173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.