Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35352674›Full record

Observational studyEpidemiology and psychiatric sciences2022

Association between benzodiazepine receptor agonist use and mortality in patients hospitalised for COVID-19: a multicentre observational study.

N Hoertel, M Sánchez-Rico, E Gulbins, J Kornhuber, R Vernet, N Beeker, A Neuraz, C Blanco, M Olfson, G Airagnes and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effect of psychotropics on the risk of COVID-19 in middle-aged and older adults.European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

N HoertelDépartement de Psychiatrie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Corentin-Celton, DMU Psychiatrie et Addictologie, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7890-1349
M Sánchez-RicoDépartement de Psychiatrie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Corentin-Celton, DMU Psychiatrie et Addictologie, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1121-8641
E GulbinsInstitute for Molecular Biology, University Medicine Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
J KornhuberDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
R VernetMedical Informatics, Biostatistics and Public Health Department, AP-HP, Centre-Université de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, F-75015Paris, France.
N BeekerAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Unité de Recherche Clinique, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France.
A NeurazINSERM, UMR_S 1138, Cordeliers Research Center, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
C BlancoDivision of Epidemiology, Services and Prevention Research, National Institute on Drug Abuse, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD20852, USA.
M OlfsonDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University/New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 69, New York, NY10032, USA.
G AiragnesDépartement de Psychiatrie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Corentin-Celton, DMU Psychiatrie et Addictologie, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France.
C LemogneUniversité de Paris, Paris, France.
J M AlvaradoDepartment of Psychobiology & Behavioural Sciences Methods, Faculty of Psychology, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Campus de Somosaguas, Pozuelo de Alarcon, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4780-0147
M ArnaoutAnesthesia and Intensive Care Department, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Île-de-France Ouest, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
C CougouleInstitut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale, IPBS, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
P MenetonINSERM U1142 LIMICS, UMRS 1142, Sorbonne Universities, UPMC University of Paris 06, University of Paris 13, Paris, France.
F LimosinDépartement de Psychiatrie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Corentin-Celton, DMU Psychiatrie et Addictologie, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France.
AP-HP/Université de Paris/INSERM COVID-19 Research Collaboration/AP-HP COVID CDR Initiative/‘Entrepôt de Données de Santé’ AP-HP Consortium
Inserm · FRUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEHôpital Cochin · FRHôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Ouest · FRNational Institute on Drug Abuse · USNew York Psychoanalytic Society and Institute · USUniversité Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo examine the association between benzodiazepine receptor agonist (BZRA) use and mortality in patients hospitalised for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

methodsA multicentre observational study was performed at Greater Paris University hospitals. The sample involved 14 381 patients hospitalised for COVID-19. A total of 686 (4.8%) inpatients received a BZRA at hospital admission at a mean daily diazepam-equivalent dose of 19.7 mg (standard deviation (s.d.) = 25.4). The study baseline was the date of admission, and the primary endpoint was death. We compared this endpoint between patients who received BZRAs and those who did not in time-to-event analyses adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, medical comorbidities and other medications. The primary analysis was a Cox regression model with inverse probability weighting (IPW).

resultsOver a mean follow-up of 14.5 days (s.d. = 18.1), the primary endpoint occurred in 186 patients (27.1%) who received BZRAs and in 1134 patients (8.3%) who did not. There was a significant association between BZRA use and increased mortality both in the crude analysis (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.20; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.74-3.74; p < 0.01) and in the IPW analysis (HR = 1.61; 95% CI = 1.31-1.98, p < 0.01), with a significant dose-dependent relationship (HR = 1.55; 95% CI = 1.08-2.22; p = 0.02). This association remained significant in sensitivity analyses. Exploratory analyses indicate that most BZRAs may be associated with an increased mortality among patients hospitalised for COVID-19, except for diazepam, which may be associated with a reduced mortality compared with any other BZRA treatment.

conclusionsBZRA use may be associated with an increased mortality among patients hospitalised for COVID-19, suggesting the potential benefit of decreasing dose or tapering off gradually these medications when possible.

Indexed as

COVID-19GABA-A Receptor AntagonistsHospitalizationHumansProportional Hazards ModelsGABA-A Receptor AntagonistsBenzodiazepineCOVID-19mortalitySARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35352674
PMCPMC8967698
OpenAlexW4220660396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.