Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35352565›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2022

Factors Associated With Medical Staff's Engagement and Perception of a Quality Improvement Program for Acute Coronary Syndromes in Hospitals: A Nationally Representative Mixed-Methods Study in China.

Shuduo Zhou, Yinzi Jin, Junxiong Ma, Xuejie Dong, Na Li, Hong Shi, Yan Zhang, Xiaoyu Guan, Kenneth A LaBresh, Sidney C Smith and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shuduo ZhouDepartment of Global Health Peking University School of Public Health Beijing China.
Yinzi JinDepartment of Global Health Peking University School of Public Health Beijing China.
Junxiong MaDepartment of Global Health Peking University School of Public Health Beijing China.
Xuejie DongDepartment of Global Health Peking University School of Public Health Beijing China.ORCID 0000-0003-0575-1287
Na LiDepartment of Global Health Peking University School of Public Health Beijing China.
Hong ShiChina Cardiovascular Association and China Chest Pain Centers Suzhou China.
Yan ZhangDivision of Cardiology Peking University First Hospital Beijing China.ORCID 0000-0002-7508-4160
Xiaoyu GuanChina Cardiovascular Association and China Chest Pain Centers Suzhou China.
Kenneth A LaBreshRTI International Waltham MA.
Sidney C SmithDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine School of Medicine University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill NC.ORCID 0000-0003-0480-0454
Yong HuoDivision of Cardiology Peking University First Hospital Beijing China.
Zhi-Jie ZhengDepartment of Global Health Peking University School of Public Health Beijing China.ORCID 0000-0002-0233-5010
Peking University · CNRTI International · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Medical staff represent critical stakeholders in the process of implementing a quality improvement (QI) program. Few studies, however, have examined factors that influence medical staff engagement and perception regarding QI programs. Methods and Results We conducted a nationally representative survey of a QI program in 6 cities in China. Quantitative data were analyzed using multilevel mixed-effects linear regression models, and qualitative data were analyzed using the framework method. The engagement of medical staff was significantly related to knowledge scores regarding the specific content of chest pain center accreditation (β=0.42; 95% CI, 0.27-0.57). Higher scores for inner motivation (odds ratio [OR], 1.79; 95% CI, 1.18-2.72) and resource support (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.02-2.24) and lower scores for implementation barriers (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67-0.98) were associated with improved treatment behaviors among medical staff. Resource support (OR, 4.52; 95% CI, 2.99-6.84) and lower complexity (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.65-1.00) had positive effects on medical staff satisfaction, and respondents with improved treatment behaviors were more satisfied with the QI program. Similar findings were found for factors that influenced medical staff's assessment of QI program sustainability. The qualitative analysis further confirmed and supplemented the findings of quantitative analysis. Conclusions Clarifying and addressing factors associated with medical staff's engagement and perception of QI programs will allow further improvements in quality of care for patients with acute coronary syndrome. These findings may also be applicable to other QI programs in China and other low- and middle-income countries. Registration URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/; Unique identifier: Chi-CTR2100043319.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeHospitalsHumansMedical StaffPerceptionQuality Improvementacute coronary syndromesmedical staffmixed‐methods studyquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID35352565
PMCPMC9075455
OpenAlexW4220683988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.