Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35352513›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomedical optics2022

Skin optical properties in the obese and their relation to body mass index: a review.

Andres J Rodriguez, Mel Tananant Boonya-Ananta, Mariacarla Gonzalez, Vinh Nguyen Du Le, Jesse Fine, Cristina Palacios, Mike J McShane, Gerard L Coté, Jessica C Ramella-Roman

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomedical optics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Pulse Oximeters: Accuracy and Artifacts.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The 2023 wearable photoplethysmography roadmap.Physiological measurement · 2023
    Review
  17. Relevance and utility of theBiomedical optics express · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andres J RodriguezFlorida International University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Miami, Florida, United States.
Mel Tananant Boonya-AnantaFlorida International University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Miami, Florida, United States.
Mariacarla GonzalezFlorida International University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Miami, Florida, United States.
Vinh Nguyen Du LeFlorida International University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Miami, Florida, United States.
Jesse FineTexas A&M University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, College Station, Texas, United States.
Cristina PalaciosFlorida International University, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Miami, Fl, United States.
Mike J McShaneTexas A&M University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, College Station, Texas, United States.
Gerard L CotéTexas A&M University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, College Station, Texas, United States.
Jessica C Ramella-RomanFlorida International University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Miami, Florida, United States.
Florida International University · USTexas A&M University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

significanceObesity is a worldwide epidemic contributing directly to several cardiovascular risk factors including hypertension and type 2 diabetes. Wearable devices are becoming better at quantifying biomarkers relevant for the management of health and fitness. Unfortunately, both anecdotal evidence and recent studies indicate that some wearables have higher levels of error when utilized by populations with darker skin tones and high body mass index (BMI). There is an urgent need for a better evaluation of the limits of wearable health technologies when used by obese individuals.

aims(1) To review the current know-how on changes due to obesity in the skin epidermis, dermis, and subcutis that could affect the skin optical properties; (2) for the green wavelength range, to evaluate the difference in absorption and scattering coefficients from the abdominal skin between individuals with and without elevated BMI. The changes include alterations in layer thickness and cell size, as well as significant differences in chromophores and scatterer content, e.g., water, hemoglobin, collagen, and lipids. APPROACH: We have summarized literature pertaining to changes in skin and its components in obesity and report the results of our search using articles published between years 1971 and 2020. A linear model was used to demonstrate the absorption and reduced scattering coefficient of the abdominal skin of individuals with and without elevated BMI in the green wavelength range (530 to 550 nm) that is typically found in most wearables.

resultsThe general trends indicate a decrease in absorption for both dermis and subcutis and an increase in reduced scattering for both epidermis and dermis. At 544-nm wavelength, a typical wavelength used for photoplethysmography (PPG), the absorption coefficient's relative percentage difference between high and low BMI skin, was 49% in the subcutis, 19% in the dermis, and negligible in the epidermis, whereas the reduced scattering coefficient relative difference was 21%, 29%, and 165% respectively.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that there could be significant errors in the output of optical devices used for monitoring health and fitness if changes due to obesity are not accounted for in their design.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Body Mass IndexEpidermisHumansObesitySkinbiophotonicsbody mass indexobesityoptical propertiesskinwearables

Identifiers

PMID35352513
PMCPMC8963797
OpenAlexW4221089796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.