Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35352493›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical imaging and radiation oncology2022

Basic cancer immunology for radiation oncologists.

Joseph Sia, Paul J Neeson, Nicole M Haynes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joseph SiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9056-0903
Paul J NeesonSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Nicole M HaynesSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

Australian GovernmentRoyal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the impressive clinical responses seen with modern cancer immunotherapy are currently limited to a subset of patients, the underlying paradigm shift has resulted in now hardly a segment in oncology that has not been touched by the immuno-oncology revolution. A growing body of data indicates that radiation therapy (RT) can modulate the tumour immune microenvironment and complement cancer immunotherapy via non-overlapping mechanisms to reinvigorate immunity against cancer. Thus, increasingly RT is viewed as a highly unique partner for immunotherapy across the spectrum of cancer settings, as radiobiology and cancer immunology foreseeably become more intertwined. Considering these developments, this review summarises the key concepts and terminology in immunology for the radiation oncologist, with a focus on the cancer setting and with reference to important recent advances. These concepts will provide a starting point for understanding the strategies that underlie current and emerging immunotherapy trials, as well as the indirect effects of RT by which immune responses against cancer are shaped.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsRadiation OncologistsHumansImmunotherapyMedical OncologyTumor Microenvironmentcancer biologycancer immunologyimmunotherapyRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID35352493
PMCPMC9311072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.