Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35352482›Full record

ArticleJournal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH2022

Basic science research opportunities in thrombosis and hemostasis: Communication from the SSC of the ISTH.

Nicola J Mutch, Sam Walters, Elizabeth E Gardiner, Owen J T McCarty, Simon F De Meyer, Verena Schroeder, Joost C M Meijers

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Nicola J MutchAberdeen Cardiovascular & Diabetes Centre, Institute of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7452-0813
Sam WaltersBreakthrough Healthcare, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8853-3084
Elizabeth E GardinerJohn Curtin School of Medical Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9453-9688
Owen J T McCartyDepartments of Biomedical Engineering and Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9481-0124
Simon F De MeyerLaboratory for Thrombosis Research, KU Leuven Campus Kulak Kortrijk, Kortrijk, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1807-5882
Verena SchroederDepartment for BioMedical Research (DBMR), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6508-3271
Joost C M MeijersDepartment of Molecular Hematology, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4198-6780
Australian National University · AUBreakthrough · USOregon Health & Science University · USResearch Institute for Chromatography · BESanquin · NLUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bleeding and thrombosis are major clinical problems with high morbidity and mortality. Treatment modalities for these diseases have improved in recent years, but there are many clinical questions remaining and a need to advance diagnosis, management, and therapeutic options. Basic research plays a fundamental role in understanding normal and disease processes, yet this sector has observed a steady decline in funding prospects thereby hindering support for studies of mechanisms of disease and therapeutic development opportunities. With the financial constraints faced by basic scientists, the ISTH organized a basic science task force (BSTF), comprising Scientific and Standardization Committee subcommittee chairs and co-chairs, to identify research opportunities for basic science in hemostasis and thrombosis. The goal of the BSTF was to develop a set of recommended priorities to build support in the thrombosis and hemostasis community and to inform ISTH basic science programs and policy making. The BSTF identified three principal opportunity areas that were of significant overarching relevance: mechanisms causing bleeding, innate immunity and thrombosis, and venous thrombosis. Within these, five fundamental research areas were highlighted: blood rheology, platelet biogenesis, cellular contributions to thrombosis and hemostasis, structure-function protein analyses, and visualization of hemostasis. This position paper discusses the importance and relevance of these opportunities and research areas, and the rationale for their inclusion. These findings have implications for the future of fundamental research in thrombosis and hemostasis to make transformative scientific discoveries and tackle key clinical questions. This will permit better understanding, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hemostatic and thrombotic conditions.

Indexed as

HemostaticsThrombosisCommunicationHemorrhageHemostasisHumansHemostaticshemorrhagehemostasisinnate immunityplateletthrombosis

Identifiers

PMID35352482
PMCPMC9325489
OpenAlexW4220957770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.