Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35352444›Full record

ArticleANZ journal of surgery2022

-8 cm H

Nima Yaftian, Benjamin Dunne, Isabelle Ferrari, Phillip Antippa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ANZ journal of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nima YaftianDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2976-0666
Benjamin DunneDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Isabelle FerrariDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Phillip AntippaDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2853-1420

Funding

Medela 2017.001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChest drain suction of -20 cm H

methodsAfter introduction of the guidelines data were collected in the study institutions' thoracic surgical database and subsequently analysed.

resultsA total of 155 patients underwent thoracoscopic lung resection. Mean patient age was 61.5 ± 13.6 years. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery was performed in 92.2% (144/155) of patients and robotically-assisted thoracoscopic surgery was performed in 7.8% (12/155) of patients. Lobectomy was performed in 56.8% (88/155) of patients, segmentectomy was performed in 11.6% (18/155) of patients and wedge resection was performed in 31.6% (49/155) of patients. Median ICC duration time was 1 day (IQR 1-3). Median length of stay was 3 days (IQR 2-6). For patients undergoing lobectomy median ICC time was 2 days (IQR 1-4.5) and median length of stay was 3.5 days (IQR 2-7), for segmentectomy median ICC time was 1 day (IQR 1-5) and median length of stay was 2 days (IQR 1-5) and for wedge resection median ICC time was 1 day (IQR 1-1) and median admission time was 2 days (IQR 1-4).

conclusionA suction level -8 cm H

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsPneumonectomyAgedHumansLength of StayLungMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesThoracic Surgery, Video-Assistedchest drainintrapleural pressurevideo assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID35352444
PMCPMC9310860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.