Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35352431›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2022

Modeling total predation to avoid perverse outcomes from cat control in a data-poor island ecosystem.

Michaela Plein, Kather Ine R O'Brien, Matthew H Holdenb, Matthew P Adamsa, Christopher M Baker, Nigel G Bean, Scott A Sisson, Michael Bode, Kerrie L Mengersen, Eve McDonald-Madden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Modeling total predation to avoid perverse outcomes from cat control in a data-poor island ecosystem.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michaela PleinSchool of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Kather Ine R O'BrienSchool of Chemical Engineering, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Matthew H HoldenbSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Matthew P AdamsaCentre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Christopher M BakerSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Nigel G BeanSchool of Mathematical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
Scott A SissonSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Michael BodeSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia.
Kerrie L MengersenSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia.
Eve McDonald-MaddenSchool of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data hungry, complex ecosystem models are often used to predict the consequences of threatened species management, including perverse outcomes. Unfortunately, this approach is impractical in many systems, which have insufficient data to parameterize ecosystem interactions or reliably calibrate or validate such models. Here we demonstrate a different approach, using a minimum realistic model to guide decisions in data- and resource-scarce systems. We illustrate our approach with a case-study in an invaded ecosystem from Christmas Island, Australia, where there are concerns that cat eradication to protect native species, including the red-tailed tropicbird, could release meso-predation by invasive rats. We use biophysical constraints (metabolic demand) and observable parameters (e.g. prey preferences) to assess the combined cat and rat abundances which would threaten the tropicbird population. We find that the population of tropicbirds cannot be sustained if predated by 1607 rats (95% credible interval (CI) [103, 5910]) in the absence of cats, or 21 cats (95% CI [2, 82]) in the absence of rats. For every cat removed from the island, the bird's net population growth rate improves, provided that the rats do not increase by more than 77 individuals (95% CI [30, 174]). Thus, in this context, one cat is equivalent to 30-174 rats. Our methods are especially useful for on-the-ground predator control in the absence of knowledge of predator-predator interactions, to assess whether 1) the current abundance of predators threatens the prey population of interest, 2) managing one predator species alone is sufficient to protect the prey species given potential release of another predator, and 3) control of multiple predator species is needed to meet the conservation goal. Our approach demonstrates how to use limited information for maximum value in data-poor systems, by shifting the focus from predicting future trajectories, to identifying conditions which threaten the conservation goal. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Indexed as

ecosystem modelinginformation scarcityinvasive speciesmanagementmultiple threatsunintended consequences

Identifiers

PMID35352431
PMCPMC9804458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.