Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35352417›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical nursing2023

'Paper care not patient care': Nurse and patient experiences of comprehensive risk assessment and care plan documentation in hospital.

Catherine Paterson, Cara Roberts, Kasia Bail

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Catherine PatersonSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Public Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1249-6782
Cara RobertsSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Public Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Kasia BailSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Public Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4797-0042

Funding

ACT Health, AustraliaUniversity of Canberra
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

objectivesTo explore organisation-wide experiences of person-centred care and risk assessment practices using existing healthcare organisation documentation.

backgroundThere is increasing emphasis on multidimensional risk assessments during hospital admission. However, little is known about how nurses use multidimensional assessment documentation in clinical practice to address preventable harms and optimise person-centred care.

designA qualitative descriptive study reported according to COREQ.

methodsMetropolitan tertiary hospital and rehabilitation hospital servicing a population of 550,000. A sample of 111 participants (12 patients, 4 family members/carers, 94 nurses and 1 allied health professional) from a range of wards/clinical locations. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted at two time points. The audio recording was transcribed, and an inductive thematic analysis was used to provide insight from multiple perspectives.

resultsThree main themes emerged: (1) 'What works well in practice' included: efficiency in the structure of the documentation; the Introduction, Situation, Background Assessment, Recommendation (ISBAR) framework and prompting for clinical decision-making were valued by nurses; and direct patient care is always prioritised. (2) 'What does not work well in practice': obtaining the patient's signature on daily care plans; multidisciplinary (MDT) involvement; duplication of paperwork and person-centred goals are not well-captured in care plan documentation. (3) 'Experience of care'; satisfaction of person-centred care; communication in the MDT was important, but sometimes insufficient; patients had variable involvement in their daily care plan; and inadequate integration of care between MDT team which negatively impacted patients.

conclusionsEfficient and streamlined documentation systems should herald feedback from nurses to address their clinical workflow needs and can support, and capture, their decision-making that enables partnership with patients to improve the individualisation of care provision. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The integration of effective MDT involvement in clinical documentation was problematic and resulted in unmet supportive care from the patient's perspective.

Indexed as

DocumentationHospitalsFocus GroupsHumansPatient Outcome AssessmentQualitative Researchcare plandocumentationmultidisciplinary teamnursespatientspreventable harmsqualitative studyrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID35352417
PMCPMC10084263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.