Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35352296›Full record

ReviewCNS drugs2022

Role of Pharmacogenomics in Individualizing Treatment for Alzheimer's Disease.

Natalie Argueta, Emily Notari, Kinga Szigeti

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in CNS drugs, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Natalie ArguetaState University of New York at Buffalo, 875 Ellicott St., Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA.
Emily NotariState University of New York at Buffalo, 875 Ellicott St., Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA.
Kinga SzigetiState University of New York at Buffalo, 875 Ellicott St., Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA. szigeti@buffalo.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6964-6385
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USBuffalo State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of Alzheimer's disease therapeutics has been challenging, with 99% of clinical trials failing to find a significant difference between drug and placebo. While the quest continues for more effective treatments, there is emerging evidence that pharmacogenetic considerations are important factors in regard to metabolism, efficacy, and toxicity of drugs. Currently, there are five US Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease; three acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, memantine, and aducanumab. Introducing a limited genetic panel consisting of APOE4, CYP2D6*10, and BChE*K would optimize acetylcholinesterase inhibitor therapy, facilitate immunotherapy risk assessment, and inform an amyloid-related imaging abnormality surveillance schedule. In view of the genetic heterogeneity of Alzheimer's disease identified in genome-wide association studies, pharmacogenetics is expected to play an increasing role in mechanism-specific treatment strategies and personalized medicine.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseasePharmacogeneticsAcetylcholinesteraseApolipoprotein E4Cholinesterase InhibitorsGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansAcetylcholinesteraseApolipoprotein E4Cholinesterase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID35352296
OpenAlexW4220876390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.