Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35352273›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2022

Vector Angle Analysis of Multimodal Neuromonitoring Data for Continuous Prediction of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia.

Murad Megjhani, Miriam Weiss, Soon Bin Kwon, Jenna Ford, Daniel Nametz, Nick Kastenholz, Hart Fogel, Angela Velazquez, David Roh, Sachin Agarwal and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Individualized autoregulation-guided arterial blood pressure management in neurocritical care.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Murad MegjhaniDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University, 177 Fort Washington Ave, 8 Milstein - 300 Center, New York, NY, USA.
Miriam WeissDepartment of Neurosurgery, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Soon Bin KwonDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University, 177 Fort Washington Ave, 8 Milstein - 300 Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jenna FordDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University, 177 Fort Washington Ave, 8 Milstein - 300 Center, New York, NY, USA.
Daniel NametzDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University, 177 Fort Washington Ave, 8 Milstein - 300 Center, New York, NY, USA.
Nick KastenholzProgram for Hospital and Intensive Care Informatics, Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Hart FogelProgram for Hospital and Intensive Care Informatics, Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Angela VelazquezDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University, 177 Fort Washington Ave, 8 Milstein - 300 Center, New York, NY, USA.
David RohDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University, 177 Fort Washington Ave, 8 Milstein - 300 Center, New York, NY, USA.
Sachin AgarwalDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University, 177 Fort Washington Ave, 8 Milstein - 300 Center, New York, NY, USA.
E Sander ConnollyNewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jan ClaassenDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University, 177 Fort Washington Ave, 8 Milstein - 300 Center, New York, NY, USA.
Gerrit A SchubertDepartment of Neurosurgery, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Soojin ParkDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University, 177 Fort Washington Ave, 8 Milstein - 300 Center, New York, NY, USA. spark@columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3688-7307
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USKantonsspital Aarau · CH

Funding

Multiparametric Prediction of Vasospasm after Subarachnoid HemorrhageK01ES026833 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI PARK, SOOJIN · 2015 to 2019
$1.1M
Machine Learning to Optimize Management of Acute Hydrocephalus PatientsR21NS113055 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI PARK, SOOJIN · 2020 to 2020
$446k
American Heart Association-American Stroke Association 20POST35210653NIEHS NIH HHS K01 ES026833NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS113055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDysfunctional cerebral autoregulation often precedes delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). Currently, there are no data-driven techniques that leverage this information to predict DCI in real time. Our hypothesis is that information using continuous updated analyses of multimodal neuromonitoring and cerebral autoregulation can be deployed to predict DCI.

methodsTime series values of intracranial pressure, brain tissue oxygenation, cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), optimal CPP (CPPOpt), ΔCPP (CPP - CPPOpt), mean arterial pressure, and pressure reactivity index were combined and summarized as vectors. A validated temporal signal angle measurement was modified into a classification algorithm that incorporates hourly data. The time-varying temporal signal angle measurement (TTSAM) algorithm classifies DCI at varying time points by vectorizing and computing the angle between the test and reference time signals. The patient is classified as DCI+ if the error between the time-varying test vector and DCI+ reference vector is smaller than that between the time-varying test vector and DCI- reference vector. Finally, prediction at time point t is calculated as the majority voting over all the available signals. The leave-one-patient-out cross-validation technique was used to train and report the performance of the algorithms. The TTSAM and classifier performance was determined by balanced accuracy, F1 score, true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative over time.

resultsOne hundred thirty-one patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage who underwent multimodal neuromonitoring were identified from two centers (Columbia University: 52 [39.7%], Aachen University: 79 [60.3%]) and included in the analysis. Sixty-four (48.5%) patients had DCI, and DCI was diagnosed 7.2 ± 3.3 days after hemorrhage. The TTSAM algorithm achieved a balanced accuracy of 67.3% and an F1 score of 0.68 at 165 h (6.9 days) from bleed day with a true positive of 0.83, false positive of 0.16, true negative of 0.51, and false negative of 0.49.

conclusionsA TTSAM algorithm using multimodal neuromonitoring and cerebral autoregulation calculations shows promise to classify DCI in real time.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaSubarachnoid HemorrhageCerebral InfarctionCerebrovascular CirculationHumansIntracranial PressureAneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhageCerebral autoregulationClassificationMachine learningNeurocritical care

Identifiers

PMID35352273
PMCPMC11973884
OpenAlexW4220707376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.