Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35352209›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2022

Novel Calculator to Estimate the Risk of Clinically Relevant Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula Following Distal Pancreatectomy.

Ibrahim Nassour, Samer AlMasri, Jacob C Hodges, Steven J Hughes, Amer Zureikat, Alessandro Paniccia

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Postoperative Opioid Use Is Associated with Increased Rates of Grade B/C Pancreatic Fistula After Distal Pancreatectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ibrahim NassourDepartment of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Samer AlMasriDepartment of Surgery, Division of GI Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 497 Scaife Hall, 3550 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.
Jacob C HodgesDepartment of Statistics, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Steven J HughesDepartment of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Amer ZureikatDepartment of Surgery, Division of GI Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 497 Scaife Hall, 3550 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.
Alessandro PanicciaDepartment of Surgery, Division of GI Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 497 Scaife Hall, 3550 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA. panicciaa2@upmc.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7047-1711
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDrain management algorithms are based on studies that predict clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) using drain fluid amylase level on POD1 (DFA1). These studies are focused on pancreaticoduodenectomy which is inherently different than distal pancreatectomy. Moreover, the change of DFA between POD1 and POD3 (ΔDFA) is underutilized despite its importance in predicting CR-POPF. We sought to generate a calculator that estimates the risk of CR-POPF following distal pancreatectomy.

methodsThe 2014-2018 pancreas-targeted ACS-NSQIP database was used to identify patients who underwent elective distal pancreatectomy. Models to predict CR-POPF were constructed using DFA1 with/without ΔDFA. The fittest model was used to construct a calculator.

resultsOut of 12,042 distal pancreatectomies, 692 patients met the study's inclusion criteria. The risk of CR-POPF was 15.9% in the included cohort versus 14.8% in the excluded one (P = 0.421). The predictors of the CR-POPF were age, operative time, DFA1, and ΔDFA. Adding ΔDFA decreased the Akaike's information criterion of the model (507.7 vs 544.7)-indicating a significantly better model fit-and improved the cross-validated area under the curve from 0.731 to 0.791. An easy-to-use calculator was created for surgeons to estimate the risk of CR-POPF based on the abovementioned variables. A sensitivity/specificity table was created at various cutoffs to direct clinical decision-making with respect to early drain removal.

conclusionsThis study highlights the importance of ΔDFA, in addition to DFA1, in predicting CR-POPF. The provided calculator will facilitate predicting CR-POPF and postoperative drain management following distal pancreatectomy.

Indexed as

PancreatectomyPancreatic FistulaAmylasesDrainageHumansPancreasPancreaticoduodenectomyPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTime FactorsAmylasesCalculatorDistal pancreatectomyNSQIPPancreatic fistula

Identifiers

PMID35352209
OpenAlexW4220984966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.