ArticlePediatric surgery international2022
Gastrojejunal (GJ) tube feeding: developing a service and evaluating associated complications in a paediatric surgical centre.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gastrostomy plus fundoplication or gastro-jejunal tube or gastrostomy alone for treating or preventing gastro-esophageal reflux in children and adolescents with neurological impairment.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Feeding jejunostomy in children: safety, effectiveness and perspectives.Pediatric surgery international · 2024Article
- Clinical characteristics of children with severe neurologic impairment: A scoping review.Journal of hospital medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGastrojejunal (GJ) tubes are becoming an established alternative method of delivering nutrition to children who do not tolerate gastric feeding. However, there is limited literature surrounding patient outcomes, the longevity of tubes or complications. We aim to highlight the development and evaluation of a service to provide children with GJ tube feeding. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective case-note review of children either undergoing an initial gastrostomy to gastrojejunal tube conversion or gastrojejunal tube replacement in our tertiary paediatric surgical centre between January 2015 and June 2018.
results134 GJ feeding tubes were placed in 33 neurologically impaired children with a median age of 4.9 years (8 months-17 years) having a median 4 tube placements per child (1-11) within the study period. All tubes were 14 or 16 Fr 'AMT G-JET' tubes with a median replacement time of 174.9 days (13-504 days). The most common indication was foregut dysmotility in children with global developmental delay. The complication rate was 34.3% (46 tubes). In the study period, 2 patients (6.1%) reverted to oral feeding, 6 patients (18.2%) to gastric feeding and 25 children (75.7%) continued with jejunal feeding. No child required fundoplication. There were no procedure-related mortalities or mortality.
conclusionsGJ tube feeding is an effective and safe method of managing children with foregut dysmotility. Many patients do not require permanent jejunal feeding, and thus the reversibility of this method is an asset. A dedicated team is needed to co-ordinate tube replacements and provide efficient long-term jejunal feeding. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.