Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35352105›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2022

Amyloid pathology but not APOE ε4 status is permissive for tau-related hippocampal dysfunction.

Emrah Düzel, Gabriel Ziegler, David Berron, Anne Maass, Hartmut Schütze, Arturo Cardenas-Blanco, Wenzel Glanz, Coraline Metzger, Laura Dobisch, Martin Reuter and 27 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

37 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Emrah DüzelInstitute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0139-5388
Gabriel ZieglerInstitute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.
David BerronInstitute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1558-1883
Anne MaassGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7889-795X
Hartmut SchützeInstitute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.
Arturo Cardenas-BlancoInstitute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.
Wenzel GlanzInstitute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.
Coraline MetzgerInstitute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.
Laura DobischGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.
Martin ReuterGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Annika SpottkeGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Frederic BrosseronGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Klaus FliessbachGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Michael T HenekaGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Christoph LaskeGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Oliver PetersGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Josef PrillerGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Eike Jakob SpruthDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Alfredo RamirezDepartment of Psychiatry, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4991-763X
Oliver SpeckDepartment of Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, Otto-von-Guericke University, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.
Anja SchneiderGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Stefan TeipelGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock, 18147 Rostock, Germany.
Ingo KilimannGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock, 18147 Rostock, Germany.
Wiltfang JensGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany.
Björn-Hendrik SchottGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8237-4481
Lukas PreisGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Daria GrefGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Franziska MaierDepartment of Psychiatry, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany.
Matthias H MunkGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Nina RoyGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Tomasso BallariniGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Renat YakupovGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3868-284X
John Dylan HaynesBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Peter DechentDepartment of Cognitive Neurology, University Medical Center Goettingen, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Klaus SchefflerDepartment of Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Michael WagnerGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Frank JessenGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DEUniversity of Cologne · DEUniversity of Bonn · DEBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin · DEOtto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg · DETechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated whether the impact of tau-pathology on memory performance and on hippocampal/medial temporal memory function in non-demented individuals depends on the presence of amyloid pathology, irrespective of diagnostic clinical stage. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the observational, multicentric DZNE-Longitudinal Cognitive Impairment and Dementia Study (DELCODE). Two hundred and thirty-five participants completed task functional MRI and provided CSF (92 cognitively unimpaired, 100 experiencing subjective cognitive decline and 43 with mild cognitive impairment). Presence (A+) and absence (A-) of amyloid pathology was defined by CSF amyloid-β42 (Aβ42) levels. Free recall performance in the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test, scene recognition memory accuracy and hippocampal/medial temporal functional MRI novelty responses to scene images were related to CSF total-tau and phospho-tau levels separately for A+ and A- individuals. We found that total-tau and phospho-tau levels were negatively associated with memory performance in both tasks and with novelty responses in the hippocampus and amygdala, in interaction with Aβ42 levels. Subgroup analyses showed that these relationships were only present in A+ and remained stable when very high levels of tau (>700 pg/ml) and phospho-tau (>100 pg/ml) were excluded. These relationships were significant with diagnosis, age, education, sex, assessment site and Aβ42 levels as covariates. They also remained significant after propensity score based matching of phospho-tau levels across A+ and A- groups. After classifying this matched sample for phospho-tau pathology (T-/T+), individuals with A+/T+ were significantly more memory-impaired than A-/T+ despite the fact that both groups had the same amount of phospho-tau pathology. ApoE status (presence of the E4 allele), a known genetic risk factor for Alzheimer's disease, did not mediate the relationship between tau pathology and hippocampal function and memory performance. Thus, our data show that the presence of amyloid pathology is associated with a linear relationship between tau pathology, hippocampal dysfunction and memory impairment, although the actual severity of amyloid pathology is uncorrelated. Our data therefore indicate that the presence of amyloid pathology provides a permissive state for tau-related hippocampal dysfunction and hippocampus-dependent recognition and recall impairment. This raises the possibility that in the predementia stage of Alzheimer's disease, removing the negative impact of amyloid pathology could improve memory and hippocampal function even if the amount of tau-pathology in CSF is not changed, whereas reducing increased CSF tau-pathology in amyloid-negative individuals may not proportionally improve memory function.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloidosisCognitive DysfunctionAmyloid beta-PeptidesAmyloidogenic ProteinsApolipoproteins EBiomarkersCross-Sectional StudiesHippocampusHumanstau ProteinsAmyloid beta-PeptidesAmyloidogenic ProteinsApolipoproteins EBiomarkerstau ProteinsAlzheimer’s disease biomarkerhippocampusmemorymild cognitive impairmentsubjective cognitive decline

Identifiers

PMID35352105
PMCPMC9128811
OpenAlexW4206554185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.