Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35351828›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2022

Mixed Selectivity in the Cerebellar Purkinje-Cell Response during Visuomotor Association Learning.

Naveen Sendhilnathan, Michael E Goldberg, Anna E Ipata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Consensus Paper: Models of Cerebellar Functions.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  2. Brain-Behavior Relationships: Neural Mechanisms of Impulsivity and Compulsivity in Neuropsychiatric Disorders.Cognitive and behavioral neurology : official journal of the Society for Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Consensus Paper: Cerebellum and Reward.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Naveen SendhilnathanDoctoral Program in Neurobiology and Behavior, Columbia University, New York 10027, New York ns3046@columbia.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3534-890X
Michael E GoldbergDepartment of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York 10027, New York.
Anna E IpataDepartment of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York 10027, New York.

Funding

Instrumentation, Fabrication, and Design CoreP30EY019007 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Xin Zhang · 2010 to 2026
$12.9M
The Cerebro-Cerebellar-Basal-Gangliar Network for Visuomotor LearningR01NS113078 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI FUSI, STEFANO, GOLDBERG, MICHAEL E. · 2019 to 2023
$5.3M
The Neurophysiology of Visual Search: Oculomotor and Visual MechanismsR01EY017039 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GOLDBERG, MICHAEL E. · 2008 to 2018
$3.8M
Instrument development &fabrication for vision researchR24EY015634 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GOLDBERG, MICHAEL E. · 2004 to 2008
$1.1M
The role of the cerebellum in visual learningR21EY028749 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GOLDBERG, MICHAEL E. · 2018 to 2019
$453k
The Neurophysiology of visual memoryR21EY020631 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GOLDBERG, MICHAEL E. · 2010 to 2010
$242k
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY019007NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017039NEI NIH HHS R21 EY020631NEI NIH HHS R21 EY028749NEI NIH HHS R24 EY015634NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS113078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the cerebellum has been traditionally considered to be exclusively involved in motor control, recent anatomic and clinical studies show that it also has a role in reward-processing. However, the way in which the movement-related and the reward-related neural activity interact at the level of the cerebellar cortex and contribute toward learning is still unclear. Here, we studied the simple spike activity of Purkinje cells in the mid-lateral cerebellum when 2 male monkeys learned to associate a right or left-hand movement with one of two visual symbolic cues. These cells had distinctly different discharge patterns between an overtrained symbol-hand association and a novel symbol-hand association, responding in association with the movement of both hands, although the kinematics of the movement did not change between the two conditions. The activity change was not related to the pattern of the visual symbols, the movement kinematics, the monkeys' reaction times, or the novelty of the visual symbols. The simple spike activity changed throughout the learning process, but the concurrent complex spikes did not instruct that change. Although these neurons also have reward-related activity, the reward-related and movement-related signals were independent. We suggest that this mixed selectivity may facilitate the flexible learning of difficult reinforcement learning problems.

Indexed as

Association LearningPurkinje CellsAnimalsCerebellumFemaleHaplorhiniLearningMaleMovementRewardcerebellumelectrophysiologyprimatesPurkinje cellsreinforcement learningreward

Identifiers

PMID35351828
PMCPMC9087720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.