Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35351824›Full record

ArticleLife science alliance2022

TET2-mediated epigenetic reprogramming of breast cancer cells impairs lysosome biogenesis.

Audrey Laurent, Thierry Madigou, Maud Bizot, Marion Turpin, Gaëlle Palierne, Elise Mahé, Sarah Guimard, Raphaël Métivier, Stéphane Avner, Christine Le Péron and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life science alliance, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Audrey LaurentUniversité Rennes 1, CNRS UMR6290, Institut de Génétique et Développement de Rennes, Campus de Beaulieu, Rennes, France.
Thierry MadigouUniversité Rennes 1, CNRS UMR6290, Institut de Génétique et Développement de Rennes, Campus de Beaulieu, Rennes, France.
Maud BizotUniversité Rennes 1, CNRS UMR6290, Institut de Génétique et Développement de Rennes, Campus de Beaulieu, Rennes, France.
Marion TurpinUniversité Rennes 1, CNRS UMR6290, Institut de Génétique et Développement de Rennes, Campus de Beaulieu, Rennes, France.
Gaëlle PalierneUniversité Rennes 1, CNRS UMR6290, Institut de Génétique et Développement de Rennes, Campus de Beaulieu, Rennes, France.
Elise MahéUniversité Rennes 1, CNRS UMR6290, Institut de Génétique et Développement de Rennes, Campus de Beaulieu, Rennes, France.
Sarah GuimardUniversité Rennes 1, CNRS UMR6290, Institut de Génétique et Développement de Rennes, Campus de Beaulieu, Rennes, France.
Raphaël MétivierUniversité Rennes 1, CNRS UMR6290, Institut de Génétique et Développement de Rennes, Campus de Beaulieu, Rennes, France.
Stéphane AvnerUniversité Rennes 1, CNRS UMR6290, Institut de Génétique et Développement de Rennes, Campus de Beaulieu, Rennes, France.
Christine Le PéronUniversité Rennes 1, CNRS UMR6290, Institut de Génétique et Développement de Rennes, Campus de Beaulieu, Rennes, France christine.le-peron@univ-rennes1.fr.
Gilles SalbertUniversité Rennes 1, CNRS UMR6290, Institut de Génétique et Développement de Rennes, Campus de Beaulieu, Rennes, France gilles.salbert@univ-rennes1.fr.
Institut de génétique et de développement de Rennes · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methylation and demethylation of cytosines in DNA are believed to act as keystones of cell-specific gene expression by controlling the chromatin structure and accessibility to transcription factors. Cancer cells have their own transcriptional programs, and we sought to alter such a cancer-specific program by enforcing expression of the catalytic domain (CD) of the methylcytosine dioxygenase TET2 in breast cancer cells. The TET2 CD decreased the tumorigenic potential of cancer cells through both activation and repression of a repertoire of genes that, interestingly, differed in part from the one observed upon treatment with the hypomethylating agent decitabine. In addition to promoting the establishment of an antiviral state, TET2 activated 5mC turnover at thousands of MYC-binding motifs and down-regulated a panel of known MYC-repressed genes involved in lysosome biogenesis and function. Thus, an extensive cross-talk between TET2 and the oncogenic transcription factor MYC establishes a lysosomal storage disease-like state that contributes to an exacerbated sensitivity to autophagy inducers.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDioxygenasesDNA-Binding ProteinsEpigenesis, GeneticDNA MethylationFemaleHumansLysosomesProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycDioxygenasesDNA-Binding ProteinsMYC protein, humanProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycTET2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID35351824
PMCPMC8963717
OpenAlexW4225420204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.