Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35351810›Full record

ArticleLupus science & medicine2022

Clinical and histopathological features of myositis in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Eleni Tiniakou, Daniel Goldman, Andrea Corse, Andrew Mammen, Michelle A Petri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lupus science & medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Clinical pearls and promising therapies in myositis.Expert review of clinical immunology
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eleni TiniakouRheumatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA etiniak1@jhmi.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4749-870X
Daniel GoldmanRheumatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Andrea CorseNeurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Andrew Mammen *Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Michelle A Petri *Division of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1441-5373
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Muscle Disease UnitZIAAR041203 · NIAMS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES · PI MAMMEN, ANDREW · 2015 to 2025
$19.7M
Hopkins Lupus CohortR01AR069572 · NIAMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PETRI, MICHELLE A · 2016 to 2020
$3.4M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR069572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objectives of this study were to compare the clinical features of patients with SLE with and without myopathy and to describe the muscle biopsy features of patients with SLE myopathy.

methodsThis nested case-control study included all subjects enrolled in the Hopkins Lupus Cohort database from May 1987 to June 2016. Subjects with elevated creatine kinase along with evidence of muscle oedema on MRI, myopathic electromyography and/or myopathic muscle biopsy features were defined as having SLE myopathy. Demographic, serological and clinical features were compared between patients with SLE with and without myopathy. Muscle biopsies were histologically classified as polymyositis, dermatomyositis, necrotising myopathy or non-specific myositis.

resultsFrom among 2437 patients with SLE, 179 (7.3%) had myopathy. African American patients were more likely to develop myositis than Caucasian patients (p<0.0001). Compared with those without myopathy, patients with SLE myopathy were more likely to have malar rash (OR 1.67, 1.22-2.29), photosensitivity (OR 1.43, 1.04-1.96), arthritis (OR 1.81, 1.21-2.69), pleurisy (OR 1.77, 1.3-2.42), pericarditis (OR 1.49, 1.06-2.08), acute confusional state (OR 2.07, 1.09-3.94), lymphopaenia (OR 1.64, 1.2-2.24), anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies (OR 1.52, 1.09-2.13), lupus anticoagulant (OR 1.42, 1-2), cognitive impairment (OR 1.87, 1.12-3.13), cataract (OR 1.5, 1.04-2.18), pulmonary hypertension (OR 1.98, 1.13-3.47), pleural fibrosis (OR 2.01, 1.27-3.18), premature gonadal failure (OR 1.9, 1.05-3.43), diabetes (OR 1.92, 1.22-3.02) or hypertension (OR 1.45, 1.06-2). Among 16 muscle biopsies available for review, the most common histological classifications were necrotising myositis (50%) and dermatomyositis (38%).

conclusionsPatients with SLE myopathy have a higher prevalence of numerous SLE disease manifestations. Necrotising myopathy and dermatomyositis are the most prevalent histopathological features in SLE myopathy.

Indexed as

DermatomyositisLupus Erythematosus, SystemicMuscular DiseasesMyositisCase-Control StudiesHumansDermatomyositisLupus Erythematosus, SystemicPolymyositis

Identifiers

PMID35351810
PMCPMC8966527
OpenAlexW4220761861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.