Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35351805›Full record

Trial reportTobacco control2023

Menthol versus non-menthol flavouring and switching to e-cigarettes in black and Latinx adult menthol combustible cigarette smokers: secondary analyses from a randomised clinical trial.

Nicole L Nollen, Eleanor L S Leavens, Jasjit S Ahluwalia, Myra Rice, Matthew S Mayo, Kim Pulvers

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Tobacco control, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03511001 (Effects Among Smokers Who Use and Do Not Use E-Cigarettes), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03511001 nacompletednot on this map

Effects Among Smokers Who Use and Do Not Use E-Cigarettes

TypeinterventionalSponsorCalifornia State University, San MarcosRan2018 to 2019Enrolled187ConditionsToxicant ExposureArmsE-Cigarette Vs. Smoking as Usual
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  5. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Effects of Nicotine Content and Preferred Flavor on Subjective Responses to E-cigarettes: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Laboratory Study.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole L NollenDepartment of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine and the University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA nnollen@kumc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0943-0061
Eleanor L S LeavensDepartment of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine and the University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2948-2384
Jasjit S AhluwaliaBehavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Alpert Medical School, and Legorreta Cancer Center, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Myra RiceNeuroscience Interdepartmental Graduate Program, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Matthew S MayoDepartment of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas School of Medicine and the University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Kim PulversPsychology, California State University San Marcos, San Marcos, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0282-1975
The University of Kansas Cancer Center · USBrown University · USCalifornia State University, San Marcos · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Kansas · US

Funding

Transgenic & Gene-Targeting Shared ResourceP30CA168524 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI ROY A. JENSEN · 2012 to 2026
$40.1M
Using wearables and EMA to examine the links between cannabis and depressionP20GM130414 · NIGMS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI Tyler Blake Wray · 2019 to 2026
$22.0M
Impact of e-cigarette nicotine concentration on compensation, cigarette use, and biomarkers of exposure and harm in African American and White smokersK01DA054995 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI LEAVENS, ELEANOR LADD SCHNEIDER · 2021 to 2025
$882k
Toxicant Exposure and Harm Perceptions in Cigarette Smokers Who Use or Do Not Use E-CigarettesSC3GM122628 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS · PI PULVERS, KIMBERLEY · 2017 to 2020
$447k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA168524NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA054995NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM130414NIGMS NIH HHS SC3 GM122628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs the US Food and Drug Administration takes regulatory action on menthol cigarettes, debate continues about how restricting menthol e-liquids might impact adult menthol smokers in switching to e-cigarettes.

methodsSwitching patterns and e-cigarette acceptability were assessed at week 6 among 64 black and Latinx menthol cigarette smokers who used JUUL menthol (n=39) or non-menthol e-cigarettes ((n=25), primarily mint or mango) as part of a randomised switching trial.

resultsNo clear evidence of effects was found between menthol versus non-menthol e-cigarettes on use or subjective effects/acceptability, effect sizes for all comparisons were small (effect size=0.0-0.2), and Bayes factor ranged from 0.10 to 0.15. Specifically, 82.1% of participants who used menthol-flavoured e-cigarettes fully or partially switched to e-cigarettes compared with 88.0% of participants who used a non-menthol (p=0.75). Further, both groups demonstrated substantial reductions in cigarettes per day (menthol e-cigarettes: -8.5±10.4 vs non-menthol e-cigarettes: -8.8±5.8, p=0.87), comparable grams of e-liquid consumed (menthol e-cigarettes: 9.2±9.8 g vs non-menthol e-cigarettes: 11.0±11.0 g, p=0.47), and positive subjective effects, including 'just right' throat hit (menthol e-cigarettes: 70.7% vs non-menthol e-cigarettes: 66.7%, p=0.93) and flavour liking (menthol e-cigarettes: 75.6% vs non-menthol e-cigarettes: 66.7%, p=0.32).

conclusionsBoth menthol and non-menthol e-cigarettes were associated with high rates of use and acceptability among menthol smokers. Findings require confirmation in a fully powered non-inferiority or equivalence study but provide preliminary evidence to inform regulatory action on menthol e-cigarettes that could slow youth initiation without impacting black and Latinx menthol cigarette smokers interested in switching to e-cigarettes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03511001.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsFlavoring AgentsMentholSmokingTobacco ProductsAdolescentAdultBayes TheoremBlack or African AmericanHispanic or LatinoHumansSmokersFlavoring AgentsMentholDisparitiesElectronic nicotine delivery devicesHarm ReductionPublic policy

Identifiers

PMID35351805
PMCPMC10246471
OpenAlexW4221031614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.