Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35351732›Full record

ReviewBMJ open2022

Factors affecting the UK junior doctor workforce retention crisis: an integrative review.

Florence Katie Lock, Daniele Carrieri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Quality in postgraduate medical education: A contested idea.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evaluating the well-being of ENT trainees in the UK: survey findings.The Journal of laryngology and otology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Florence Katie LockCollege of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK florence.lock@nhs.net.ORCID 0000-0002-4787-5512
Daniele CarrieriCollege of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3143-8430

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine the factors contributing to the junior doctor workforce retention crisis in the UK using evidence collected directly from junior doctors, and to develop recommendations for changes to address the issue.

designIntegrative review. DATA SOURCES: Searches were conducted on Ovid Medline and HMIC to locate evidence published between January 2016 and April 2021. This was supplemented by publications from relevant national organisations. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: English-language papers relating to UK junior doctor retention, well-being or satisfaction which contained data collected directly from junior doctors were included. Papers focusing solely on the pandemic, factors specific to one medical specialty, evaluation of interventions, or numerical data with no evidence relating to causation were excluded. Review papers were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data were extracted and coded on NVivo by FKL, then thematic analysis was conducted.

results47 papers were included, consisting of academic (qualitative, quantitative, mixed and commentary) and grey literature. Key themes identified were working conditions, support and relationships, and learning and development, with an overarching theme of lack of flexibility. The outcomes of these factors are doctors not feeling valued, lacking autonomy, having a poor work-life balance, and providing compromised patient care. This results in need for a break from medical training.

conclusionThis review builds on findings of related literature regarding working environments, isolation, stigma, and desire for autonomy, and highlights additional issues around learning and training, flexibility, feeling valued, and patient care. It goes on to present recommendations for tackling poor retention of UK junior doctors, highlighting that the complex problem requires evidence-based solutions and a bottom-up approach in which junior doctors are regarded as core stakeholders during the planning of interventions.

Indexed as

Medical Staff, HospitalPhysiciansHumansUnited KingdomWorkforceWorkplacehuman resource managementmedical education & trainingpublic healthqualitative researchquality in healthcare

Identifiers

PMID35351732
PMCPMC8960457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.