Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35351713›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2022

Examining family planning and adverse pregnancy outcomes for women with active tuberculosis disease: a systematic review.

Yen Nguyen, Katherine C McNabb, Jason E Farley, Nicole Warren

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Adverse pregnancy outcomes and complications of tuberculosis in pregnant women.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Tuberculosis and Sexual and Reproductive Health of Women in Four African Countries.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yen NguyenJohns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA ynguyen2@jhu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3760-4441
Katherine C McNabbJohns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Jason E FarleyJohns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Nicole WarrenJohns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

A Nurse Case Management Intervention to Improve MDR-TB/HIV Coinfection OutcomesR01AI104488 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FARLEY, JASON EDWARD · 2014 to 2019
$3.2M
Understanding and Predicting Loss to Follow-up from Multi-Drug Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment in the Setting of High-HIV BurdenF30AI165167 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MCNABB, KATHERINE C · 2021 to 2023
$149k
NIAID NIH HHS F30 AI165167NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI104488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectives(1) Summarise and evaluate the current evidence of tuberculosis (TB)-associated pregnancy outcomes, (2) evaluate the state of the science of family planning during TB treatment and (3) provide recommendations to move forward to improve care and outcomes during TB disease.

designSystematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane, Web of Science and Scopus were searched from September 2009 to November 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies were included if they assessed pregnant women with active TB, drug-resistant TB (DR-TB) or TB/HIV coinfection and examined pregnancy, maternal, fetal/birth and TB or TB/HIV coinfection outcomes. Studies were also included if they examined family planning services among women initiating TB treatment. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers extracted data using PRISMA guidelines and conducted quality assessment using the Joanna-Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools. The level of evidence was reported using the Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice guidelines.

results69 studies were included in this review. Case reports, case series, case controls, cohort studies, secondary data analyses and a service delivery improvement project conducted in 26 countries made up the totality of the evidence. Most studies reported pregnancy complications for mothers (anaemia, postpartum haemorrhage, deaths) and fetuses or newborns (low birth weight, premature birth, and spontaneous or induced abortions). Few studies discussed the value of offering family planning to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes. One study examined the effect of a provider training on contraceptive use with reported increased contraceptive use.

conclusionsIntegrating family planning services within a TB treatment programme is essential to reduce adverse TB-associated maternal-child outcomes. Despite well-established adverse pregnancy outcomes, little attention has been paid to family planning to prevent poor pregnancy outcomes for women with TB/DR-TB. Recommendations for clinicians, TB programmes and researchers are provided and reflect evidence presented in this review.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsPregnancy ComplicationsTuberculosisContraceptive AgentsFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeContraceptive AgentsHIV & AIDSPublic healthPUBLIC HEALTHREPRODUCTIVE MEDICINETuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID35351713
PMCPMC8961125
OpenAlexW4221055122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.