Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35351115›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2022

Effectiveness of innovative instructional module for professional competence in health literacy in medical students.

Hui-Fang Yang, Chia-Chen Chang, Pei-Ling Tseng, Hsiang-Ru Lai, Jaw-Shiun Tasi, Wei-Hsin Huang, Yu-Hao Fan, Ci-Xiang Weng, Chen-Yin Tung

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. An Important Strategy to Improve Adolescent Health Literacy: COVID-19 Modules in High School in Indonesia.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2023
    Article
  11. Physician Health Literacy Competencies: A Qualitative Study Using Focus Groups.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Hui-Fang YangDepartment of Health Promotion and Health Education, College of Education, National Taiwan Normal University, 162, Section 1, Heping E. Rd, Taipei City, 106, Taiwan.
Chia-Chen ChangDepartment of Senior Citizen Service Business, College of Human Ecology and Design, St. John's University, New Taipei, Taiwan.
Pei-Ling TsengDepartment of Health Promotion and Health Education, College of Education, National Taiwan Normal University, 162, Section 1, Heping E. Rd, Taipei City, 106, Taiwan.
Hsiang-Ru LaiDepartment of Health Promotion and Health Education, College of Education, National Taiwan Normal University, 162, Section 1, Heping E. Rd, Taipei City, 106, Taiwan.
Jaw-Shiun TasiDepartment of Family Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wei-Hsin HuangCommunity Health Center, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yu-Hao FanDepartment of General Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ci-Xiang WengDepartment of General Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chen-Yin TungDepartment of Health Promotion and Health Education, College of Education, National Taiwan Normal University, 162, Section 1, Heping E. Rd, Taipei City, 106, Taiwan. s09144@ntnu.edu.tw.
Mackay Memorial Hospital · TWNational Taiwan Normal University · TWMinistry of Health and Welfare · TWNational Taiwan University Hospital · TWSt. John's University · TWTri-Service General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysicians should be equipped with professional competence in health literacy to communicate more effectively with patients with limited health literacy. However, the health literacy curriculum has not yet been refined globally, and is scarce in Taiwan's medical education. We implemented an innovative instructional module to attain professional competence in health literacy among medical students and investigated its effects.

methodsWe adopted a quasi-experimental design and recruited 204 fifth-year Taiwanese medical students between December 2019 and May 2020. Participants who worked as clerks at the Department of Family Medicine of three medical schools in northern Taiwan were assigned to the experimental group through convenience sampling. A total of 98 students received a three-hour innovative instruction, including medical simulation videos, role-playing, and board games. Both the experimental and control groups completed the online pre-test and mail-in post-test. A generalized estimating equation was applied to measure the effects of the intervention.

resultsThere was a significant difference between the experimental and control groups in terms of professional competence in health literacy in all three aspects. In terms of knowledge, the experimental group improved 12% more than the control group (𝛽=0.12, 95% CI: 0.05 ~ 0.19, p = 0.001). In terms of attitude, the experimental group improved by an average of 0.27 more points per question than the control group (𝛽=0.27, 95% CI: 0.08 ~ 0.46, p = 0.007). As for skill, the experimental group improved by an average of 0.35 more points per question than the control group (𝛽=0.35, 95% CI: 0.14 ~ 0.55, p = 0.001).

conclusionThe proposed innovative instructional module significantly improved fifth-year medical students' professional competence in health literacy, which is expected to benefit their future medical practices.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyStudents, MedicalClinical CompetenceCurriculumHumansProfessional CompetenceHealth literacyMedical educationMedical studentProfessional competence

Identifiers

PMID35351115
PMCPMC8960696
OpenAlexW4226033172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.