Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35351032›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Risk factors for twin pregnancy in women undergoing double cleavage embryo transfer.

Panpan Chen, Kai-Lun Hu, Jiani Jin, Ruixue Chen, Qiqi Xu, Wei Zhao, Runju Zhang, Lanfeng Xing, Yimin Zhu, Dan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Panpan Chen *Key Laboratory of Reproductive Genetics (Ministry of Education) and Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310006, People's Republic of China.
Kai-Lun Hu *Key Laboratory of Reproductive Genetics (Ministry of Education) and Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310006, People's Republic of China.
Jiani Jin *Key Laboratory of Reproductive Genetics (Ministry of Education) and Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310006, People's Republic of China.
Ruixue ChenKey Laboratory of Reproductive Genetics (Ministry of Education) and Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310006, People's Republic of China.
Qiqi XuKey Laboratory of Reproductive Genetics (Ministry of Education) and Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310006, People's Republic of China.
Wei ZhaoKey Laboratory of Reproductive Genetics (Ministry of Education) and Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310006, People's Republic of China.
Runju ZhangKey Laboratory of Reproductive Genetics (Ministry of Education) and Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310006, People's Republic of China.
Lanfeng XingKey Laboratory of Reproductive Genetics (Ministry of Education) and Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310006, People's Republic of China.
Yimin ZhuKey Laboratory of Reproductive Genetics (Ministry of Education) and Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310006, People's Republic of China.
Dan ZhangKey Laboratory of Reproductive Genetics (Ministry of Education) and Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310006, People's Republic of China. zhangdan@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTwo or more embryo transfers have been used to increase the success rate of live birth in traditional in vitro fertilization (IVF) strategy at the expense of increased risks of multiple pregnancy and adverse perinatal outcomes. The decision regarding the elective single embryo transfer or double embryo transfer remains inconclusive. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk factors for twin pregnancy in IVF.

methodsParticipants who underwent their first fresh IVF cycle where two cleavage stage embryos were transferred in Women's Hospital of Zhejiang University between January 2010 and December 2018 were included in this retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome was twin delivery. Secondary outcomes included preterm birth and low birth weight

resultsFifteen thousand four hundred fifty-nine women were available for final analysis, in which 1511 women resulted in twin delivery and 4788 women had singleton delivery. Female age over 35 was associated with reduced rates of twin pregnancy compared with female age at or less than 35 (9.5% vs 25.1%, aRR = 0.38 (0.27. 0.55)). Poor-type endometrium was associated with reduced rates of twin pregnancy (19.2% vs 27.5%, aRR = 0.75 (0.58. 0.96)). Two good-quality embryos for transfer was associated with significantly higher rates of twin pregnancy compared with one good-quality or none good-quality embryo (26% vs 12.8% vs 9.3%, aRR = 0.56 (0.45. 0.70), aRR = 0.44(0.26. 0.74)). Female age over 35 and none or one good-quality embryo for transfer were associated with reduced rate of low birth weight and preterm birth.

conclusionWomen with age over 35, poor-type endometrium, one good-quality embryo or none good-quality embryo were associated with reduced rate for twin pregnancy.

Indexed as

Pregnancy, TwinPremature BirthEmbryo TransferFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsLow birth weightPreterm birthRisk factorTwin pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID35351032
PMCPMC8966328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.