Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35350994›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2022

Developing a dynamic simulation model to support the nationwide implementation of whole genome sequencing in lung cancer.

Michiel van de Ven, Maarten IJzerman, Valesca Retèl, Wim van Harten, Hendrik Koffijberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Michiel van de VenUniversity of Twente, Department of Health Technology and Services Research, TechMed Centre, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Maarten IJzermanUniversity of Twente, Department of Health Technology and Services Research, TechMed Centre, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Valesca RetèlUniversity of Twente, Department of Health Technology and Services Research, TechMed Centre, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Wim van HartenUniversity of Twente, Department of Health Technology and Services Research, TechMed Centre, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Hendrik KoffijbergUniversity of Twente, Department of Health Technology and Services Research, TechMed Centre, Enschede, the Netherlands. h.koffijberg@utwente.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-1753-0652
Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital · NLUniversity of Twente · NLThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study shows how dynamic simulation modeling can be applied in the context of the nationwide implementation of Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to inform organizational decisions regarding the use of complex and disruptive health technologies and how these decisions affect their potential value.

methodsUsing the case of the nationwide implementation of WGS into clinical practice in lung cancer in the Dutch healthcare system, we developed a simulation model to show that including service delivery features across the diagnostic pathway can provide essential insight into the affordability and accessibility of care at the systems level. The model was implemented as a hybrid Agent-Based Model and Discrete-Event Simulation model in AnyLogic and included 78 hospital agents, 7 molecular tumor board agents, 1 WGS facility agent, and 5313 patient agents each year in simulation time.

resultsThe model included patient and provider heterogeneity, including referral patterns, capacity constraints, and diagnostic workflows. Patient preference and adoption by healthcare professionals were also modeled. The model was used to analyze a scenario in which only academic hospitals have implemented WGS. To prevent delays in the diagnostic pathway, the capacity to sequence at least 1600 biopsies yearly should be present. There is a two-fold increase in mean diagnostic pathway duration between no patients referred or all patients referred for further diagnostics.

conclusionsThe systems model can complement conventional health economic evaluations to investigate how the organization of the workflow can influence the actual use and impact of WGS. Insufficient capacity to provide WGS and referral patterns can substantially impact the duration of the diagnostic pathway and thus should be considered in the implementation of WGS.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsCosts and Cost AnalysisHealth PersonnelHumansWhole Genome SequencingDiagnosticsDynamic simulation modelingImplementationOncologyWhole genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID35350994
PMCPMC8962015
OpenAlexW4220809095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.