Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35350992›Full record

ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2022

Multi-modal locomotor costs favor smaller males in a sexually dimorphic leaf-mimicking insect.

Romain P Boisseau, Thies H Büscher, Lexi J Klawitter, Stanislav N Gorb, Douglas J Emlen, Bret W Tobalske

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Romain P BoisseauDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Dr, Missoula, MT, 59812, USA. romain.boisseau@umontana.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4317-1064
Thies H BüscherFunctional Morphology and Biomechanics, Zoological Institute, Kiel University, Am Botanischen Garten 9, 24098, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0639-4699
Lexi J KlawitterDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Dr, Missoula, MT, 59812, USA.
Stanislav N GorbFunctional Morphology and Biomechanics, Zoological Institute, Kiel University, Am Botanischen Garten 9, 24098, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9712-7953
Douglas J EmlenDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Dr, Missoula, MT, 59812, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2549-7319
Bret W TobalskeDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Dr, Missoula, MT, 59812, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5739-6099

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn most arthropods, adult females are larger than males, and male competition is a race to quickly locate and mate with scattered females (scramble competition polygyny). Variation in body size among males may confer advantages that depend on context. Smaller males may be favored due to more efficient locomotion leading to higher mobility during mate searching. Alternatively, larger males may benefit from increased speed and higher survivorship. While the relationship between male body size and mobility has been investigated in several systems, how different aspects of male body morphology specifically affect their locomotor performance in different contexts is often unclear.

resultsUsing a combination of empirical measures of flight performance and modelling of body aerodynamics, we show that large body size impairs flight performance in male leaf insects (Phyllium philippinicum), a species where relatively small and skinny males fly through the canopy in search of large sedentary females. Smaller males were more agile in the air and ascended more rapidly during flight. Our models further predicted that variation in body shape would affect body lift and drag but suggested that flight costs may not explain the evolution of strong sexual dimorphism in body shape in this species. Finally, empirical measurements of substrate adhesion and subsequent modelling of landing impact forces suggested that smaller males had a lower risk of detaching from the substrates on which they walk and land.

conclusionsBy showing that male body size impairs their flight and substrate adhesion performance, we provide support to the hypothesis that smaller scrambling males benefit from an increased locomotor performance and shed light on the evolution of sexual dimorphism in scramble competition mating systems.

Indexed as

InsectaSexual Behavior, AnimalAnimalsBody SizeFemaleMalePlant LeavesSex CharacteristicsAdhesionComputational fluid dynamicsFlightPhasmatodeaScramble competition

Identifiers

PMID35350992
PMCPMC8962604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.