Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35350883›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2022

Evolution of cooperation with joint liability.

Guocheng Wang, Qi Su, Long Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Guocheng WangCenter for Systems and Control, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-2197-6486
Qi SuCenter for Mathematical Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6490-686X
Long WangCenter for Systems and Control, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-5600-8157

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

'Personal responsibility', one of the basic principles of social governance, requires one to be accountable for what one does. However, personal responsibility is far from the only norm ruling human interactions, especially in social and economic activities. In many collective communities such as among enterprise colleagues and family members, one's personal interests are often bound to others'-once one member breaks the rule, a group of people have to bear the punishment or sanction. Such a mechanism is termed 'joint liability'. Although many real-world cases have evidenced that joint liability can help to maintain collective collaboration, a deep and systematic theoretical analysis on how and when it promotes cooperation remains lacking. Here, we use evolutionary game theory to model an interacting system with joint liability, where one's losing credit could deteriorate the reputation of the whole group. We provide the analytical condition to predict when cooperation evolves and analytically prove that in the presence of punishment, being jointly liable greatly promotes cooperation. Our work stresses that joint liability is of great significance in promoting current economic prosperity.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionCooperative BehaviorGame TheoryHumansPunishmentSocial Behaviorcooperationevolutionary dynamicsfitness interdependencejoint liabilitypunishment

Identifiers

PMID35350883
PMCPMC8965391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.