Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35350741›Full record

ArticleADMET & DMPK2019

Building in-house PBPK modelling tools for oral drug administration from literature information.

Silvia Grandoni, Nicola Cesari, Giandomenico Brogin, Paola Puccini, Paolo Magni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ADMET & DMPK, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Silvia GrandoniUniversità degli Studi di Pavia, Dept. Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, Pavia, Italy.
Nicola CesariChiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A, Pharmacokinetic, Biochemistry and Metabolism Department, Parma, Italy.
Giandomenico BroginChiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A, Pharmacokinetic, Biochemistry and Metabolism Department, Parma, Italy.
Paola PucciniChiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A, Pharmacokinetic, Biochemistry and Metabolism Department, Parma, Italy.
Paolo MagniUniversità degli Studi di Pavia, Dept. Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, Pavia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interest in using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models as a support to the drug development decision making process has rapidly increased in the last years. These kind of models are examples of the "bottom up" modelling strategy, which progressively integrates into a mechanistic framework different information as soon as they become available along the drug development. For this reason PBPK models can be used with different aims, from the early stages of drug development up to the clinical phases. Different software tools are nowadays available. They can be categorized in "designed software" and "open software". The first ones typically include commercial platforms expressly designed to implement PBPK models, in which the model structure is pre-defined, assumptions are generally not explicitly declared and equations are hidden to the user. Even if the software is validated and routinely used in the pharmaceutical industry, sometimes they do not allow working with the flexibility needed to cope with specific applications/tasks. For this reason, some scientists prefer to define and implement their own PBPK tool in "open" software. This paper shows how to build an in-house PBPK tool from species-related physiological information available in the literature and a limited number of drug specific parameters generally made available by the drug development process. It also reports the results of an evaluation exercise that compares simulated plasma concentration-time profiles and related pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters (i.e., AUC, C

Indexed as

In Vitro In Vivo ExtrapolationModel Based Drug DevelopmentModel-based predictionOral administrationPBPK modelsPharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID35350741
PMCPMC8957249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.