ArticleOncology letters2022
Comprehensive analysis of competitive endogenous RNAs network: Identification and validation of prediction model composed of mRNA signature and miRNA signature in gastric cancer.
Article in Oncology letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic value of CTF1 in glioma and its role in the tumor microenvironment.Translational cancer research · 2024Article
- Exosomal lncRNAs as diagnostic and therapeutic targets in multiple myeloma.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Novel biomarkers for early detection of gastric cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Machine learning algorithms reveal potential miRNAs biomarkers in gastric cancer.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC), one of the most lethal malignant tumors, is highly aggressive with a poor prognosis, while the molecular mechanisms underlying it remain largely unknown. Although advanced imaging techniques and comprehensive treatment facilitate the diagnosis and survival of some GC patients, the precise diagnosis and prognosis are still a challenge. The present study used publicly available gene expression profiles from The Cancer Genome Atlas and Gene Expression Omnibus datasets including mRNA, micro (mi)RNA and circular (circ)RNA of GC to establish a competing endogenous RNA network (ceRNA). Further, the present study performed least absolute shrinkage and selector operator regression analysis on the hub RNAs to establish a prediction model with mRNA and miRNA. The ceRNA network contained 109 edges and 56 nodes and the visible network contains 13 miRNAs, 9 circRNAs and 34 mRNAs. The five mRNA-based signature were CTF1, FKBP5, RNF128, GSTM2 and ADAMTS1. The area under curve (AUC) value of the diagnosis training cohort was 0.9975. The prognosis of the high-risk group (RiskScore >4.664) was worse compared with that of the low-risk group (RiskScore ≤4.664; P<0.05) in the training cohort. The five miRNA-based signature were miR-145-5p, miR-615-3p, miR-6507-5p, miR-937-3p and miR-99a-3p. The AUC value of the diagnosis training cohort was 0.9975. The prognosis of the high-risk group (RiskScore >1.621) was worse compared with that of the low-risk group (RiskScore ≤1.621; P<0.05) in the training cohort. The validation cohorts indicated that both five mRNA and five miRNA-based signatures had strong predictive power in diagnosis and prognosis for GC. In conclusion, a ceRNA network was established for GC and a five mRNA-based signature and a five miRNA-based signature was identified that enabled diagnosis and prognosis of GC by assigning patient to a high-risk group or low-risk group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.