ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2022
Feeding the machine: Challenges to reproducible predictive modeling in resting-state connectomics.
Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trait-Relevant Tasks Improve Personality Prediction From Structural-Functional Brain Network Coupling.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- MRI-based radiomics for preoperative T-staging of rectal cancer: a retrospective analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Article
- From Serendipity to Precision: Integrating AI, Multi-Omics, and Human-Specific Models for Personalized Neuropsychiatric Care.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- A prior-knowledge-guided feature selection method and its application to biomarker identification of schizophrenia.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Translational Connectomics: overview of machine learning in macroscale Connectomics for clinical insights.BMC neurology · 2024Review
- Article
- A robust brain network for sustained attention from adolescence to adulthood that predicts later substance use.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- A deep learning approach for mental health quality prediction using functional network connectivity and assessment data.Brain imaging and behavior · 2024Article
- Personalized functional brain network topography is associated with individual differences in youth cognition.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Enhancing precision in human neuroscience.eLife · 2023Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this critical review, we examine the application of predictive models, for example, classifiers, trained using machine learning (ML) to assist in interpretation of functional neuroimaging data. Our primary goal is to summarize how ML is being applied and critically assess common practices. Our review covers 250 studies published using ML and resting-state functional MRI (fMRI) to infer various dimensions of the human functional connectome. Results for holdout ("lockbox") performance was, on average, ∼13% less accurate than performance measured through cross-validation alone, highlighting the importance of lockbox data, which was included in only 16% of the studies. There was also a concerning lack of transparency across the key steps in training and evaluating predictive models. The summary of this literature underscores the importance of the use of a lockbox and highlights several methodological pitfalls that can be addressed by the imaging community. We argue that, ideally, studies are motivated both by the reproducibility and generalizability of findings as well as the potential clinical significance of the insights. We offer recommendations for principled integration of machine learning into the clinical neurosciences with the goal of advancing imaging biomarkers of brain disorders, understanding causative determinants for health risks, and parsing heterogeneous patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.