Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35350584›Full record

ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2022

Feeding the machine: Challenges to reproducible predictive modeling in resting-state connectomics.

Andrew Cwiek, Sarah M Rajtmajer, Bradley Wyble, Vasant Honavar, Emily Grossner, Frank G Hillary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrew CwiekDepartment of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4764-0748
Sarah M RajtmajerCollege of Information Sciences and Technology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1464-0848
Bradley WybleDepartment of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9984-3037
Vasant HonavarCollege of Information Sciences and Technology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5399-3489
Emily GrossnerDepartment of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Frank G HillaryDepartment of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1427-0218

Funding

Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002014 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI KRASCHNEWSKI, JENNIFER L. · 2016 to 2025
$33.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this critical review, we examine the application of predictive models, for example, classifiers, trained using machine learning (ML) to assist in interpretation of functional neuroimaging data. Our primary goal is to summarize how ML is being applied and critically assess common practices. Our review covers 250 studies published using ML and resting-state functional MRI (fMRI) to infer various dimensions of the human functional connectome. Results for holdout ("lockbox") performance was, on average, ∼13% less accurate than performance measured through cross-validation alone, highlighting the importance of lockbox data, which was included in only 16% of the studies. There was also a concerning lack of transparency across the key steps in training and evaluating predictive models. The summary of this literature underscores the importance of the use of a lockbox and highlights several methodological pitfalls that can be addressed by the imaging community. We argue that, ideally, studies are motivated both by the reproducibility and generalizability of findings as well as the potential clinical significance of the insights. We offer recommendations for principled integration of machine learning into the clinical neurosciences with the goal of advancing imaging biomarkers of brain disorders, understanding causative determinants for health risks, and parsing heterogeneous patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Brain networksClassifiersClinical neuroscienceMachine learningPredictive modeling

Identifiers

PMID35350584
PMCPMC8942606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.