Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35350565›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Preoperative Embolization for Intracranial Giant Meningioma Tumorectomy: A Retrospective, Observational, Matched Cohort Study.

Yi Yin, Yuhong Li, Zhouyang Jiang, Chao Zhang, Hongfei Ge, Zhi Chen, Rong Hu, Yujie Chen, Xuegang Li, Fei Li and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yi YinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Yuhong LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Zhouyang JiangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Chao ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Hongfei GeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Zhi ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Rong HuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Yujie ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Xuegang LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Fei LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Hua FengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Southwest Hospital · CNArmy Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The potential benefits of preoperative embolization for intracranial meningiomas are still under debate. We aimed to investigate whether preoperative embolization can improve surgical and functional outcomes, based on controlling patient- and tumor-related confounding factors. Methods: We reviewed all meningioma cases in our department from January 2016 to May 2021. Cases in the nonembolization cohort were matched to the embolization cohort by 1:1 ratio propensity score matching, through controlling patient- and tumor-related confounds. Surgical outcomes, complications, and functional outcomes were retrospectively compared between these two groups. Results: Sixty-six cases in each group were included in our study after being matched. We did not find any significant differences of estimated blood loss (600.00 (400) vs. 500.00 (500.00) ml, Conclusion: Our study showed significant lower rates of surgical complications and long-term disabilities of meningioma patients treated with preoperative embolization. There were no significant differences in estimated blood loss, surgical time, and blood transfusion volume between embolization and nonembolization groups.

Indexed as

complicationembolizationmeningiomaoutcomepreoperative

Identifiers

PMID35350565
PMCPMC8957910
OpenAlexW4220821164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.