ArticleCureus2022
Outcome of Childhood Cerebellar Pilocytic Astrocytoma: A Series With 20 Years of Follow Up.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cerebellar pilocytic astrocytoma: predictors of recurrence based on MRI morphology-a single-centre experience.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCerebellar pilocytic astrocytoma (PCA) is one of the few CNS tumors that can be cured with gross-total removal (GTR). In this series, we had 39 patients diagnosed with cerebellar PCA, 27 patients (70%) had GTR, and mean follow-up period was 62 months with no tumor recurrence.
objectiveTo assess the long-term outcome of childhood cerebellar PCA treated at our institute during the period 2000-2020 and to highlight our surgical protocol. METHODOLOGY: Retrospective review of all patients under 18 years of age who were diagnosed with cerebellar PCA and had surgical excision between 2000 and 2020 at the Medical City of King Saud University.
resultsThe study included 39 patients: 17 males and 22 females, the mean age was 8.4 years. Radiologically, the tumor was solid in eight patients, cystic in 15 patients, and mixed components were found in 16 patients. The lesion was located in the right cerebellar hemisphere in 12 patients, left cerebellar hemisphere in five patients, and midline 22 patients. The tumor size ranged from 2 to 7 cm in its greatest diameter, it was <5 cm in 13 patients and >5 cm in 26 patients. Thirty-one patients had preoperative hydrocephalus. GTR of the tumor was achieved in 27 patients and subtotal resection (STR) was done in 12 patients, 18 patients required permanent ventriculoperitoneal (V-P) shunt, and five patients had postoperative radiotherapy. Postoperative complications included infection in two patients, cerebellar mutism in two patients, and significant neurologic disability in four patients. The duration of follow-up ranged from 0 to 240 months (mean follow-up period: 62.0 months). The outcome at 10 years was good in 30 patients, fair in four patients, poor in four patients, and one patient died. Recurrence was documented in nine patients, seven of them had GTR and two had STR.
conclusionGTR, if achievable, is curative for childhood cerebellar PCA. Many posterior fossa surgical complications could be avoided with watertight dural closure. Although new dural substitutes are available we prefer using autologous grafts (pericranium). It is easy to harvest pericranial graft from the external ventricular drain (EVD) site. The insertion of EVD synchronously with GTR of the tumor and gradual weaning of EVD could avoid the insertion of V-P shunt.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.