Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35350483›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Gaseous Microemboli in the Cardiopulmonary Bypass Circuit: Presentation of a Systematic Data Collection Protocol Applied at Istituto Cardiocentro Ticino.

Mira Puthettu, Stijn Vandenberghe, Pietro Bagnato, Michele Gallo, Stefanos Demertzis

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mira PuthettuCardiac Surgery, Istituto Cardiocentro Ticino, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, CHE.
Stijn VandenbergheCardiac Surgery, Istituto Cardiocentro Ticino, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, CHE.
Pietro BagnatoCardiac Surgery, Istituto Cardiocentro Ticino, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, CHE.
Michele GalloCardiac Surgery, University of Padua, Padua, ITA.
Stefanos DemertzisCardiac Surgery, Istituto Cardiocentro Ticino, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, CHE.
University of Padua · ITUniversità della Svizzera italiana · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Air emboli are reported to enter the cardiovascular system during cardiac surgery despite air-bubble filters in the arterial line of the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). A potential association with stroke, covert cerebral insults and cognitive decline after cardiac surgery has been hypothesized. Although most of the previous studies failed to prove it, this hypothesis cannot be rejected because the situation in the operating room (OR) is multifactorial and complex. Therefore, rigorous and standardized protocols are needed to investigate sources, patterns, as well as effective quantity and volume of air embolism.  We hereby present our protocol in detail for systematic data collection as a standard quality control measure at our center, where air bubbles in the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit are measured by a commercial bubble counter. We also show a preview of the type of information that can be obtained for future analysis. The eventual aim is to determine a potential association between air emboli and adverse postoperative outcomes, as well as to identify major sources of air bubbles generation and in the long run to find effective prevention strategies.

Indexed as

air embolibubble countercardiac surgerycardiopulmonary bypass circuitsystematic data collection

Identifiers

PMID35350483
PMCPMC8933722
OpenAlexW4213227308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.