Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35350412›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2022

Best Practices for Probiotic Research in Athletic and Physically Active Populations: Guidance for Future Randomized Controlled Trials.

Alex E Mohr, Jamie Pugh, Orla O'Sullivan, Katherine Black, Jeremy R Townsend, David B Pyne, Floris C Wardenaar, Nicholas P West, Corrie M Whisner, Lynne V McFarland

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06087146 (Sauerkraut Supplementation in Athletes for Gut Microbiome Optimization), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06087146 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Sauerkraut Supplementation in Athletes for Gut Microbiome Optimization: Case Series and Literature Review (Project KOMS)

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Gut Microbiome Center (Centar za crijevni mikrobiom)Ran2023 to 2023Enrolled10ConditionsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeArmsSauerkraut (Brassica oleracea v. capitata)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Microorganisms · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Supplementation withFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  14. Impact of probioticiScience · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Microorganisms · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Alex E MohrCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Jamie PughResearch Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Orla O'SullivanTeagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Ireland.
Katherine BlackDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Jeremy R TownsendExercise and Nutrition Science Graduate Program, Lipscomb University, Nashville, TN, United States.
David B PyneResearch Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Floris C WardenaarCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Nicholas P WestSchool of Medical Science and Menzies Health Institute of QLD, Griffith Health, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia.
Corrie M WhisnerCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Lynne V McFarlandDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Arizona State University · USGriffith University · AULipscomb University · USLiverpool John Moores University · GBUniversity College Cork · IEUniversity of Canberra · AUUniversity of Otago · NZUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probiotic supplementation, traditionally used for the prevention or treatment of a variety of disease indications, is now recognized in a variety of population groups including athletes and those physically active for improving general health and performance. However, experimental and clinical trials with probiotics commonly suffer from design flaws and different outcome measures, making comparison and synthesis of conclusions difficult. Here we review current randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using probiotics for performance improvement, prevention of common illnesses, or general health, in a specific target population (athletes and those physically active). Future RCTs should address the key elements of (1) properly defining and characterizing a probiotic intervention, (2) study design factors, (3) study population characteristics, and (4) outcome measures, that will allow valid conclusions to be drawn. Careful evaluation and implementation of these elements should yield improved trials, which will better facilitate the generation of evidence-based probiotic supplementation recommendations for athletes and physically active individuals.

Indexed as

athletesclinical trialsguidelinesperformancephysical activityprobioticsstudy design

Identifiers

PMID35350412
PMCPMC8957944
OpenAlexW4220724106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.