ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022
Cerebral Autoregulation Indices Are Not Interchangeable in Patients With Sepsis.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Profiling cerebral hemodynamics in sepsis and septic shock patients with transcranial doppler: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Pooled it
- Non-Invasive Multimodal Neuromonitoring in Non-Critically Ill Hospitalized Adult Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Pooled it
- Early acetaminophen use is associated with the reduced mortality risk in patients with sepsis-associated encephalopathy: a retrospective study.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Brain Ultrasonography in Critically Ill Septic Patients: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Review
- Myths and methodologies: Assessment of dynamic cerebral autoregulation by the mean flow index.Experimental physiology · 2024Article
- Quantification of dynamic cerebral autoregulation: welcome to the jungle!Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2023Review
- Cerebral Autoregulation, Cerebral Hemodynamics, and Injury Biomarkers, in Patients with COVID-19 Treated with Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.Neurocritical care · 2023Observational
- Potential Neuroprotective Role of Melatonin in Sepsis-Associated Encephalopathy Due to Its Scavenging and Anti-Oxidative Properties.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- POCUS, how can we include the brain? An overview.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) is frequently altered in patients with sepsis and may be associated with sepsis-associated brain dysfunction. However, the optimal index to quantify dCA in patients with sepsis is currently unknown. Objective: To assess the agreement between two validated dCA indices in patients with sepsis. Methods: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data in patients with sepsis; those with acute or chronic intracranial disease, arrhythmias, mechanical cardiac support, or history of supra-aortic vascular disease were excluded. Transcranial Doppler was performed on the right or left middle cerebral artery (MCA) with a 2-MHz probe, and MCA blood flow velocity (FV) and arterial pressure (BP) signals were simultaneously recorded. We calculated two indices of dCA: the mean flow index (Mxa), which is the Pearson correlation coefficient between BP and FV (MATLAB, MathWorks), and the autoregulation index (ARI), which is the transfer function analysis of spontaneous fluctuations in BP and FV (custom-written FORTRAN code). Impaired dCA was defined as Mxa >0.3 or ARI ≤ 4. The agreement between the two indices was assessed by Cohen's kappa coefficient. Results: We included 95 patients (age 64 ± 13 years old; male 74%); ARI was 4.38 [2.83-6.04] and Mxa was 0.32 [0.14-0.59], respectively. There was no correlation between ARI and Mxa ( Conclusions: Agreement between ARI and Mxa in assessing dCA in patients with sepsis was poor. The identification of specific factors influencing the dCA analysis might lead to a better selection of the adequate cerebral autoregulation (CAR) index in critically ill patients with sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.