Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35350400›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022

Cerebral Autoregulation Indices Are Not Interchangeable in Patients With Sepsis.

Juliana Caldas, Armin Alvaro Quispe-Cornejo, Ilaria Alice Crippa, Carles Subira, Jacques Creteur, Ronney Panerai, Fabio Silvio Taccone

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Quantification of dynamic cerebral autoregulation: welcome to the jungle!Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2023
    Review
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. POCUS, how can we include the brain? An overview.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Juliana CaldasEscola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública, Salvador, Brazil.
Armin Alvaro Quispe-CornejoDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Ilaria Alice CrippaDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Carles SubiraDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Alhaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitaria de Manresa, Barcelona, Spain.
Jacques CreteurDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Ronney PaneraiDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Fabio Silvio TacconeDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BEAlthaia · ESD’Or Institute for Research and Education · BRNational Institute for Health Research · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) is frequently altered in patients with sepsis and may be associated with sepsis-associated brain dysfunction. However, the optimal index to quantify dCA in patients with sepsis is currently unknown. Objective: To assess the agreement between two validated dCA indices in patients with sepsis. Methods: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data in patients with sepsis; those with acute or chronic intracranial disease, arrhythmias, mechanical cardiac support, or history of supra-aortic vascular disease were excluded. Transcranial Doppler was performed on the right or left middle cerebral artery (MCA) with a 2-MHz probe, and MCA blood flow velocity (FV) and arterial pressure (BP) signals were simultaneously recorded. We calculated two indices of dCA: the mean flow index (Mxa), which is the Pearson correlation coefficient between BP and FV (MATLAB, MathWorks), and the autoregulation index (ARI), which is the transfer function analysis of spontaneous fluctuations in BP and FV (custom-written FORTRAN code). Impaired dCA was defined as Mxa >0.3 or ARI ≤ 4. The agreement between the two indices was assessed by Cohen's kappa coefficient. Results: We included 95 patients (age 64 ± 13 years old; male 74%); ARI was 4.38 [2.83-6.04] and Mxa was 0.32 [0.14-0.59], respectively. There was no correlation between ARI and Mxa ( Conclusions: Agreement between ARI and Mxa in assessing dCA in patients with sepsis was poor. The identification of specific factors influencing the dCA analysis might lead to a better selection of the adequate cerebral autoregulation (CAR) index in critically ill patients with sepsis.

Indexed as

autoregulation indexcerebral autoregulationcorrelationMxasepsis

Identifiers

PMID35350400
PMCPMC8957883
OpenAlexW4220664767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.