Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35350363›Full record

ArticleACS omega2022

Fire Propagation Behavior of Some Biobased Furanic Compounds with a Focus on the Polymer PEF.

Anitha Muralidhara, Ed de Jong, Hendrikus Roy A Visser, Gert-Jan M Gruter, Christophe Len, Jean-Pierre Bertrand, Guy Marlair

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anitha MuralidharaInstitut National de l'Environnement Industriel et des Risques (INERIS), Parc Technologique Alata, BP 2, Verneuil-en-Halatte, F-60550 Picardie, France.
Ed de JongAvantium Renewable Polymers, Zekeringstraat 29, 1014 BV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5300-4230
Hendrikus Roy A VisserAvantium Renewable Polymers, Zekeringstraat 29, 1014 BV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gert-Jan M GruterAvantium Renewable Polymers, Zekeringstraat 29, 1014 BV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4213-0025
Christophe LenChimieParisTech, PSL Research University, CNRS, Institute of Chemistry for Life and Health Sciences, 11 Rue Pierre et Marie Curie, F-75005 Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8013-0881
Jean-Pierre BertrandInstitut National de l'Environnement Industriel et des Risques (INERIS), Parc Technologique Alata, BP 2, Verneuil-en-Halatte, F-60550 Picardie, France.
Guy MarlairInstitut National de l'Environnement Industriel et des Risques (INERIS), Parc Technologique Alata, BP 2, Verneuil-en-Halatte, F-60550 Picardie, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0919-0854

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Avantium is in the process of building a flagship plant for the production of furandicarboxylic acid (FDCA) and the derived polyester polyethylene furanoate (PEF) using their YXY process. Because of the status of this development of monomer production, next to storage and shipping, polymer production, application development, and polymer recycling, the understanding of the safety aspects of the YXY process is key for a successful deployment of the technology. In this paper, the focus is on fire propagation-related issues for both monomeric furanic compounds and for the polymer PEF and results are compared with relevant reference materials. The current assessment addresses the fire initiation and propagation behavior of FDCA and PEF for the very first time. From the fire safety viewpoint, it can be concluded that of the furanics tested, FDCA has a better safety margin both in terms of a lower thermal and chemical threat, as fires resulting from FDCA are not easily shifting toward underventilated fire scenarios. The obtained results with the PEF polymer are useful in understanding the nature and behavior of PEF under real fire conditions. PEF seems slightly better in terms of the total energy released from the combustion process than the bulk polyester PET. In addition, PEF fires result in lesser CO and soot yields compared to PET, which is proof for a better completeness of combustion.

Identifiers

PMID35350363
PMCPMC8945070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.