Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35350299›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Local Insect Availability Partly Explains Geographical Differences in Floral Visitor Assemblages of

Danae Laina, Eva Gfrerer, Valerie Scheurecker, Roman Fuchs, Marielle Schleifer, Carina Zittra, Rüdiger Wagner, Marc Gibernau, Hans Peter Comes, Anja C Hörger and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Floral Scents of DeceptiveEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Danae LainaDepartment of Environment and Biodiversity, Paris Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Eva GfrererDepartment of Environment and Biodiversity, Paris Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Valerie ScheureckerDepartment of Environment and Biodiversity, Paris Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Roman FuchsDepartment of Environment and Biodiversity, Paris Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Marielle SchleiferDepartment of Environment and Biodiversity, Paris Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Carina ZittraDepartment of Functional and Evolutionary Ecology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Rüdiger WagnerDepartment of Limnology, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany.
Marc GibernauLaboratory of Sciences for the Environment, CNRS - University of Corsica, Ajaccio, France.
Hans Peter ComesDepartment of Environment and Biodiversity, Paris Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Anja C HörgerDepartment of Environment and Biodiversity, Paris Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Stefan DötterlDepartment of Environment and Biodiversity, Paris Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 30175
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Geographical variation in abundance and composition of pollinator assemblages may result in variable selection pressures among plant populations and drive plant diversification. However, there is limited knowledge on whether differences in local visitor and pollinator assemblages are the result of site-specific strategies of plants to interact with their pollinators and/or merely reflect the pollinator availability at a given locality. To address this question, we compared locally available insect communities obtained by light-trapping with assemblages of floral visitors in populations of

Indexed as

Arum maculatumgeneralizationlocal pollinator availabilitypollinator limitationPsychodidaereproductive successspecializationSphaeroceridae

Identifiers

PMID35350299
PMCPMC8957888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.