Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35350290›Full record

ArticleCase reports in neurology

Plasmapheresis for Extrapontine Myelinolysis: A Case Series and a Literature Review.

Devasmitha Wijesundara, Bimsara Senanayake

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Devasmitha WijesundaraInstitute of Neurology, National Hospital of Sri Lanka, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Bimsara SenanayakeInstitute of Neurology, National Hospital of Sri Lanka, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
National Hospital of Sri Lanka · LK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central pontine myelinolysis (CPM) and extrapontine myelinolysis (EPM) are syndromes of osmotic demyelination attributed to the rapid correction of hyponatraemia. Isolated EPM is a rare clinical entity which poses a significant diagnostic challenge especially in the absence of a rapid rise in sodium. Typical MRI findings aid in the diagnosis. Treatment for established osmotic demyelination syndrome (ODS) is nonstandardized and the prognosis is considered poor. Therefore, different strategies including plasmapheresis (TPE), immunoglobulins (IVIG), and steroids have been used. We present our findings from a series of successfully treated patients at a high-volume tertiary care center in Sri Lanka, with an appraisal of available literature. A total of 21 patients with established ODS are analyzed here, including 5 cases of EPM managed by the authors over a 2-year period. Thirteen (40.2%) patients were treated with plasmapheresis alone, 6 (28.5%) received dual therapy (TPE + IVIG or steroids) and 2 (9.5%) received triple therapy (TPE + IVIG + steroids). There was complete or near complete response in 18 (85.7%) and complete response in 10 (47.6%) patients. We conclude that although the management of CPM/EPM is largely symptomatic, patients may show a significant response to immunomodulatory therapy. The marked improvement in motor, cognitive, and functional domains supports an immune basis for osmotic demyelination. Plasmapheresis, in particular, leads to favorable outcomes in ODS which is supported by previously published case reports. We propose its utility as standard treatment.

Indexed as

Osmotic demyelinationParkinsonismPlasmapheresis

Identifiers

PMID35350290
PMCPMC8921903
OpenAlexW4213330564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.